SC: Use quota to transcend caste, not perpetuate it
Top Stories
- Rs 20L seized from Ajit Chandila relative's home, another ex-cricketer held
- Indian American teen Eesha Khare invents wondrous 20-sec charger, Google eyes bid
- India and China ask SRs to work on more border steps
- Can't charge man with rape over consensual sex even if marriage eludes: Supreme Court
- Saudi Arabian authorities refuse to accept new Indian passports
Amidst the din over quota, the Supreme Court has cautioned against any disproportionate use of "reservation" saying it would prove counterproductive and only help perpetuate casteism.
"Reservation is necessary for transcending caste and not for perpetuating it. Reservation has to be used in a limited sense, otherwise it will perpetuate casteism in the country," a five-judge Constitution Bench said in its recent order upholding the validity of certain constitutional amendments empowering the state to make laws providing reservation for SCs and STs in the matter of promotions in government jobs.
The Bench consisting Chief Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justices K G Balakrishnan, S H Kapadia, C K Thakker and P K Balasubramanyam, while fully recognising the social justice cause that underlies principles of reservation, also founded its advise to the Centre and state governments to stick to the 50 per cent ceiling with some sound logic. The court warned that any breach in the cut-off point could lead to a "reverse discrimination".
"Anti-discrimination legislation has a tendency of pushing towards de facto reservation. Therefore, a numerical benchmark is the surest immunity against charges of reservation," the judgment emphasised.
Another point on which the judgment revolves and which holds immense significance to the current quota debate is the Supreme Court's insistence on a quantifiable data to back any law on reservation. The court underlined this while upholding the validity of the 77th, 81st, 82nd and 85th Constitutional amendments.
Drawing a distinction between the amendments, which merely vested the state with power to make laws for reservation in promotion for SCs and STs and the law itself, the court said any such law would be liable to be struck down if it does not satisfy the existence of compelling reasons like "backwardness, inadequacy of representation and administrative efficiency".
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled six balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


On mother's day, she waits for son jailed for 17 yrs
Ten killed in Aizawl landslide, 7 trapped
Maharashtra does away with finger test on rape victims
6 Haryana villages decide not to send girls to school to avoid harassment




















