Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

SC wants three-member panel on police reforms

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Taking into account the delaying attempts made by the majority of states/UTs in implementing directions for police reforms, the Supreme Court on Friday ordered setting up of a three-member committee to ensure compliance of its 2006 order.

    Justice K T Thomas, a former judge of the apex court, would head the committee.

    A directive in this regard came after a Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan gave its accord to the terms of reference put forth by advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for former IPS officer Prakash Singh, who’s the petitioner in the case. While one of the two remaining committee members would be nominated by Justice Thomas, who was awarded the Padma Bhushan in 2007 for his impeccable judicial career, the other would be named by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

    Agreeing to the submissions by the petitioner’s counsel, the Bench said the committee would ensure compliance of the SC order of 2006, where it had directed all the states to carry out reforms in police machinery. The committee would be entrusted with the task of monitoring the implementation of directions and in no manner would it be involved in examining the directions.

    Ads by Google

    Asking the panel to submit its report within three months, the SC said the panel would look into the difficulties faced by the states.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.