Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Scientists opposed to deal forget no reaching power target without it

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    Retired scientists have again planted the red flag on the Indo-US nuclear deal, rejecting the Bill in its current shape. But in doing so, they have overlooked an important fact that the Department of Atomic Energy, in its vision document, has set a target of generating 20,000 MW power by 2020. Of this, the DAE envisages 8,000 MW to be produced by six light water reactors imported from other countries.

    This import is impossible without the nuclear deal (the Bill is to be signed tomorrow by US President George W Bush). Perhaps, that is the reason why the DAE is more cautious in its response and is inclined to wait until the final 123 agreement is negotiated. However, former DAE heads are willing to go to the extent of taking a relook at these targets as the Bill passed by the US Congress is unacceptable to them.

    ‘‘We are disappointed by the end product which is different from what was agreed on July 18. If the end product remains the same, then the deal is unacceptable to us. It is a natural corollary that DAE will then have to revise its targets,’’ former DAE head M S Srinivasan, who opposed the Bill in its final shape, told The Indian Express.

    Ads by Google

    It is important to note here that these targets were set well before the deal was firmed up. ‘‘We are going in for import of light water technology as an external additionality in order to accelerate our nuclear power programme. This, however, requires overcoming certain constraints imposed by international politics. Any reasonable world order can only expect countries to fulfill their international safeguards commitments and no more than that,’’ says the DAE vision document.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.