Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Seen and heard

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Why they did so, however, isn’t quite as simple as quick-and-dirty analysis on live TV would have us believe. The idea that Sheila Dikshit somehow turned into a Youth Icon when nobody was looking was played with briefly and then, thankfully, discarded. Subsequently, people have surmised for us that the half-decade between Malhotra, 76, and Dikshit, 71, was crucial; that young people,“didn’t want to politicise terrorism” (unlike, say, the 40-pluses?); and really pretty much everything except the possibility that the younger generation prefers undyed hair. And of all the wild surmises thrown out, only one really rings true — that the problem was not Malhotra’s age, but the age of the BJP’s ideas. Those were, if you will forgive the half-lisped pun, youthless. The BJP has dominated Delhi for decades; under Malhotra and Madan Lal Khurana, it grew rapidly in the 1980s. It hasn’t, however, updated the way it spoke to Delhi about itself. Delhi’s BJP is still fighting yesterday’s battles in today’s city: allying with the Akalis to remind people about 1984, hoping that Sahib Singh Verma’s son can “deliver” Jats in Outer Delhi. Delhi’s young voters will have looked at a party that still views their city as the Punjabi khatri refugee town it once was rather than the complex, cosmopolitan, metropolis it is becoming, and rejected it.

    That’s the crucial difference about younger voters, younger countries: they don’t see why certain disagreements become the focus for political squabbling because of history, rather than for any current reason. Consider the Clinton-Obama battle in the US. Some of the open hostility that Obama’s devoted young worshippers indulged in against the Clintons’ “divisiveness” was because they simply didn’t understand the context: the deeply divided generation that came of age in the 1960s and how the two presidents from that generation — Bush and Clinton — represented two poles of that decade’s vicious campus fights. An electorate that grows younger moves on where the political leadership cannot.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Seen and heardBy: Vishal Sangha | 10-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Please dont compare old imbeciles like Shiela Dixit and Vijay Kumar Malhotra in the Congress and BJP with Barack Obama. If it has to be about youth then lets have young people run the government for a change and please, please let it not be the scions of the Indian royalty (read the Gandhi and other lesser familiies)
    DelhiBy: Rahul | 10-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Delhi is not the same anymore, the migration, the bangladeshis, the demographic explosion of minority( the real truth behind the youth) have ensured now Delhi will always with pro-terrorist Congress. Delhi is just now a shade better than the border districts of Assam.
    Seen and heardBy: Aravind | 10-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward The article is probably quite true, but our youth probably are mis-guided. If it was purely for electoral win that the politicai parties are contesting and not for nation building, it is ok. The BJP definitely overly exagerated their compaingn tools (and were in some way out dated), so definitely the message correct - the BJP failed to put the messge accross correctly. The media has definitely failed to educate our youth on the correct perspective for the country as they seems to have got carried away by election mimicks. Also there is a fear psychosis created by the media in the minds of certain voters (which was probably managed by the vested interests) hardline BJP viz.softline Congress.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.