Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Set the record right

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Professor Amartya Sen has written a remarkable book, The Idea of Justice. He has recently visited India and given interviews to the press where he has expressed his closeness, attachment, even fondness, for the leftist parties in India’s polity. According to Sen, leftists carry the torch of “concern for the poor” and “social justice for the underprivileged” in India. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Contemporary Indian leftists represent their own selfish party interests and their sense of misplaced historical determinism which is locked in a time-warp. They do not care for underprivileged citizens and certainly do not care to improve the lot of the poor. In Sen’s own paradigm, Indian leftists pursue purist, ideologically correct “Niti”. They have no concern for “Nyaya” or just consequences.

    The Left takes credit for land reform in Bengal. Land reform could and should have been a one-time change in endowments with the poor getting clear title to identified parcels of land. But this runs the risk of the poor turning into free property-owners and then deserting the Left parties. Hence, the leftist version of land reform has merely conferred “tenancy rights” on West Bengal’s rural poor. These rights are not tradable; they inhibit mobility for the rural poor and lead to disputes among siblings, one of whom may want to migrate. Effective assertion of these tenancy rights requires the blessings of the local CPM party boss thus ensuring that the poor peasant is now beholden not to the zamindar or jotedar, but to the local apparatchik, who more often than not lives in a palatial house! When the Politburo wants to acquire land from poor peasants and transfer this land to capitalists (not all of whom are party cronies, merely honourable men, or shall we say honourable persons in the interest of gender-insensitive political correctness?), it turns out that valuing legal tenancy rights and several unregistered tenancy rights, which exist by courtesy of the party boss, leads to serious misgivings and disputes.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Good article- but nyaya/niti distinction is speciousBy: vivekiyer1 | 19-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Good article. Sen has always had to perform a difficult balancing act w.r.t the Bengali Left.However, his Nyaya/Niti distinction is specious though having the appearance of utility. It would be nice to say 'you can only achieve Justice by Just means' and, by using Nyaya for Justice and Niti for 'just means' save yourself from the shame of having uttered a Sen-tentious tautology.Unfortunately, vide Vidura Niti or any other canonical text, Niti rules derive from a continuous meditation on the essential equality- or for Vedanta- identity of all beings- in other words there is no 'just means' which is not a praxis of 'absolute justice'.Incidentally, I see no merit in Sen's writing on Choice of Technique etc. That was a project- still perhaps appearing meaningful in the 40's- which failed. Krugman thinks it was coz increasing returns couldn't be modelled. The truth is, lots more grass-roots info became available and people saw the approach was silly.
    Niti and Nyaya-Idealism and Natural JusticeBy: Atul Chandra | 25-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward I have not had the opportunity yet to go through the book by Mr. Sen, howeveer from the exerpts I gather the following view:Justice has a natural course and depends on perception. Therefore, we must attempt to incrementally providing better justice instead of hankering after an 'ideologically perfect' justice.The base premise here is that there are opposing approaches to achieving practical justice and the result is like a spectrum of shades which depends on which direction you approach from-viz. Ideology or Nature.Will someone tell me if I am right in my understanding and if not, how?
    Indian CommunismBy: Vivek Umrao Glendenning | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Communism needs reform in itself. A community needs continuous reforms. The ground realities of communities cannot be changed by logic. Continuous introspection must be done.
    AmartyaBy: Anup | 23-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Jaitirth is welcome to air his opinion and views on Sen -- that is the essence of the 'arguementative Indian'. But any attempt to sound condescending on an extensively researched erudite work reflects an innate internal bias and refusal to reflect and reconsider; much less appreciative of the impact of the new paradigm of justice that Sen is seeking to espouse. Especially in the Indian context wherein institutional justice has failed to ameliorate the unfair exploitation that is engendered as a given without efforts to correct it by those whose responsibility it is.
    amaratya senBy: niranjan desai | 23-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward his love for muslims and his silence on what is going on in bagladesh with hindus is perverse. he criticises india but has no courage to condemn muslims .in bagladesh the muslims are making lives of hindus miserable.what bengalis have done to bengal is well-known .these luddites have ruined bengal by forcibly acquiring land and distributing not to the masses but to their own goonda cadres. the bengalis persecuted marwaris who were the only one to bother about bengal and ratan tata was not even in business then. what would ratan tata have against the bengalis who are lazy and who unionise so that they do not have to work. poor bengalis flee bengal and are flooding other indian states. this is what communism has done.this is the case with sen's bengladeshis too. the fact is most intellectuals are afraid to speak against muslims as they will have to pay with their life.why does sen come to india and lecture us when his family is settled in other advanced ,capitalist countries?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.