Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Sexuality Equality

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Homo
    Gay rights activist Gunjan Sharma (right) with a friend at a rally at Jantar Mantar to welcome the judgment.

    The verdict will also make it easier to provide medical treatment to gays, many of whom are at high risk of HIV-Aids. The National Aids Control Organisation, run by the Union Health Ministry, had in fact filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court stating that Section 377 made it difficult for them to implement health measures amongst India’s 23 lakh homosexuals. The Home Ministry had, however, opposed the move.

    The current UPA government had initially moved to repeal Section 377, but later backtracked “to hold discussions with all sections of society,” including religious leaders. In contrast, the court said that “in our view, Indian Constitutional law does not permit criminal law to be held captive by the popular misconceptions of who the LGBTs (lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders) are.”

    Without explicitly suggesting so, the court also hinted to Parliament to “effectuate the recommendations of the Law Commission of India in its 172nd Report.” The Law Commission’s report had recommended that Parliament amend Section 377 through legislation.

    Ads by Google

    Purushottaman Mulloli, whose organisation Joint Action Council, Kannur (JACK) had opposed the petition in court, told The Indian Express that he was “disappointed with the verdict,” and was considering filing an appeal in the Supreme Court.

    Though the verdict is high on symbolism, it applies only within the state of Delhi. An appeal in the Supreme Court might take a while. For the moment, though, as a 149-year-old law faces its biggest defeat, Mayur Suresh, a gay man and lawyer in the case, said he was “simply soaking in the significance of the moment.”

    Previous123
    section 377 of indian penal code has an unique value.By: TANIA | 05-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Basically we are human beings. we are no more animals. we no more roam around in jungle like animals do. we have created a society. we have created some rules and some punishments for the violations of such rules. In every living thing sex is observed and that is for the reproduction OF it's future generation. sex is thus not for personal pleasure but it is the main knot to reproduction and thus the concept of marriage had come to give licence to have sex. so that a legal child can come to see this world. Now where is the logic of homosexuality and unnatural sex? It cannot be argued that it is a choice of person to person ie, personal liberty under article 21. THE ONLY POSITIVE SIDE WHICH I FIND IS THAT IF LEGALISATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY AND UNNATURAL OFFENCE IS DONE THEN INDIAN WILL SURELY LESSEN DOWN THE HUGE POPULATION. "INDIA WHICH EXPERIENCES MORE MOUTH AND LESS FOOD WILL SURELY EXPERIENCE A DAY WITH MORE FOOD AND LESS MOUTH AND AGAIN FOOD AND NO MOUTH".
    Legal Opinion-Consensual Sex Freedom Plus The Actions Humanly By: Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana | 05-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Delhi High Court Sets Historic Benchmark. Sexuality Equality-The consensual sex freedom or otherwise any actions humanly are mainly connected with questions of difference between the rights and wrongs or the truth and the falsehood in the context of the privacy and the dignity of each individual..........REACTION…….. Its unethical decision of the court. We can just say that the court went for cheap popularity by giving unnatural decision……. Zaheerul Hassan, Lahore…….…REPLY……….. What is ethical legally, keeping in mind, my views and yours? Unethical for whom, for you and I or the parties involved for preventing trespassing in their privacy and dignity? I am of the opinion that the decision will definitely reduce the gap between the truth and the falsehood, preached hypocritically by many means in India and elsewhere. The court has not granted absolute freedom but strict restrictions are imposed in the Judgment, normally not followed by the consensual parties.
    ManagerBy: M. Hussain | 05-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We all believe in Allah/God/Bhagwan. We know our life is very short at any time it may come to an end. Nobody can give guarantee that he/she can be alive for a specific period. When we know Allah is the creator of the world and every religion prohibits "HOMOSEX", then why people look for a short enjoyment. This is not only spreading HIV diese also it will have long consequential effects on our coming generation. I respect every religion and every religion prohibits "HOMOSEX".When any disaster comes we cry to Allah/God/Bhagwan, when such evils are coming open, definately the creator will be angry and whatever problems are coming in this world is due to the non-obeyance of creator's instruction.So I request every respectful Indian regardless of their religion
    Legal Opinion-Consensual Sex Freedom Plus The Actions Humanly By: Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Delhi High Court Sets Historic Benchmark. Sexuality Equality-The consensual sex freedom or otherwise any actions humanly are mainly connected with questions of difference between the rights and wrongs or the truth and the falsehood in the context of the privacy and the dignity of each individual. By trespassing the privacy and the individual dignity of consented parties is always wrong and unwarranted under the law. From the judgment, it looks as basic structure of our constitution was ignored in India so far. UN called the judgment as a land mark ruling in India from human rights angle and to encourage more HIV victims to come forward to seek treatment and information. Now, it looks as India also slowly submitting before the world opinion and agreeing to reduce the gap between the truth and the falsehood, preached hypocritically by many means in India. The worldwide joyous mood and opinion of the section of society must be honored and respected. The freedom is also not without riders.
    Decriminalising HomosexualityBy: Vineet Trikha | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward First of all, congratulations to the so-called straight community because Delhi High court judgement now legalises anal and oral sex for you as well. Secondly,though there might not be any medicine for HIV or AIDS, however, the best way to avoid it is to abstain from sex. So the so-called straight community can stop going for multiple partner sex, and I am sure your 'tradition' and your 'culture' might not be allowing that, but Indian Culture does. Moreover, request to all the religious outfits that please stop entering other people's bedroom and stop interpreting religion for others. Aleast for me, its my private matter.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.