Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Modi ignored Jafri’s plea for help: Rupa Mody

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Rupa Mody
    Rupa Mody arrives at the special designated court in Ahmedabad on Tuesday.

    Chief Minister Narendra Modi had not responded to the pleas for help from Congress MP Ehsan Jafri before the massacre began at Gulberg Society in 2002, Rupa Mody, who lost her son in the killings, told the specially designated trial court in Ahmedabad on Tuesday.

    Her deposition tallies with the one given before the court by another eyewitness to the massacre, Imtiaz Pathan. Rupa had lost her eight-year-old son Azhar in the Gulberg Society massacre and her story had later inspired the Hindi movie, Parzania. The movie was not screened in Gujarat following widespread opposition by the saffron brigade in the state.

    Rupa told the court that on February 28, 2002 when Gulberg Society residents were attacked by a communal mob, Jafri had told her about his telephonic conversation with Narendra Modi requesting him for protection. Jafri had also told Rupa that he did not get appropriate answer from the CM, she stated in the court.

    Ads by Google

    Rupa identified some of the accused in the case allegedly involved in the carnage and instigating the mob.

    She further told the court that 2-3 months after the incident, the then police inspector of Meghaninagar police station, KG Erda, also one of the accused in the case, had made her sign an affidavit in his favour in connivance with two other accused, Dr Atul Vaidhya and Bharat Teli.

    She said the three had assured her that they will help her in finding out her missing son. According to Rupa, she also had a telephonic conversation with the then Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad City, P C Pande and that she had requested him to provide police protection. She said the Commissioner had even asked her about the number of the people stranded in the society but no help was sent. Rupa said the attack actually intensified immediately after her conversation with Pande.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    hang modiBy: jignesh | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward modi is a murderer and he and his accompalices should be hanged in public.
    Modi is a democratically elected chief minister of a stateBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 14-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Jignesh, if you are so sure that Modi is a murderer, why don't you go and give the evidence to the SIT probing the riots? From the name of her son, it is clear that Ms. Rupa Modi is either a Muslim or the wife of a Muslim and therefore, it is very easy to manipulate her to testify against Narendra Modi. It is yet to be proved whether Jafri had indeed made any call to Narendra Modi. It is just a testimony by a petitioner which in legal parlour is only 'hearsay'. Why don't you wait till the court pronounces its verdict instead of yourself being the investigator, accuser and judge all packaged into one?
    False testimonyBy: Chirag K. Shah | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Now tomorrow....it will Musharaf who will give a statement that Modi Abused him in speech rally...What a crap...Modi should be PM of Great India...
    Musharah is not from GujaratBy: Deepan Shah | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward It is childish to refer Musharaf and involve him in Gujarat riots issue. Have faith in our court system and just go on watching how Gujarat government did not protect innocent people during 2002 riots. Many facts are yet to be revealed. Anybody who violated norms and misadministered whosoever he is, a minister or a police officer must be punished severely.
    See from where the fire had BegunBy: chandhu | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward We need to see from where was the fire began, it is started with the Train burst. The Train was burnt only because there were pilgrims travelling in the train. Almost people and politicians in our country talk about the post Godhra issue and no one talks about the Train burnt and the innocent people killed in the Train. Also, always the UPA Govt says UPA is trying to get United India but they never support non minorites, where does the united india concept of UPA Govt stands in the Godhra issue.
    To deepan,some enlighting factsBy: Indian | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward In 2002,971 out of nearly 60 lacs muslims lost their lives against nearly 3000 of 12 lacs sikhs in Delhi 1984.Police was silent spectator in Delhi(Sikh)riots whereas Gujarat police fired thousands of bullets to control riots claiming almost equal lives from both the communities.Army was called out on the first day of riots.Rajiv Gandhi justified Delhi riots by saying that the earth shakes when big tree falls.Modi government did take initiatives to curb the mob unlike congress during sikh roits which was openly sponsored by Rajiv.Also remember guj roits happened post godhra.
    Media Hype over testimoniesBy: shekhar | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The fact that a court testimony has become news piece itself tell a lot about it.Have you heard of cross examination in court.A testimony cannot be evidence if not corraborated with evidence.Teesta seetalvad is alrady known to have tutored many false witnesses.I agree that many innocent ppl got killed but mob violence is difficult to contain in india.
    What happened in Gujarat was sad and unfortunate incident, but 1984 Delhi riots was major one when compared to thisBy: Indian | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward I do not understand why media and so called NGOs like Teesta are after Modi.I advise these people to see Cong rule from 1947 till 1990s in Gujarat and tabulate the riots in Gujarat and ask questions to Congress.What happened in Gujarat was sad and unfortunate incident,but 1984 Delhi riots was major one when compared to this.Also sikh roits was government sponsored.
    CorrectBy: Indian | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Correct.Mob violence is difficult to contain in India inspite of which modi government did give an attempt unlike congress which under rajiv sponsored Sikh roits.
    Gujarat Riots - State ManagedBy: jaguar | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Shocking, no my friend if properly investigated this is nothing, it was a state managed massacare of innocents by religious fanatics.
    Mr.By: RC Sharma | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Rupa has given a testimony, but did not say that Narendra abused Jaffri, as the other witness alleged. It is a heresey evidence, which cannot be corroborated.
    Shocking stories are coming out in the courtBy: Dinesh Patel | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Unbelievable information is getting released in the court and if it is true it is very shocking. Complete investigation is required in this 2002 riots issue and justice must provided to the victims.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.