Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Singur ghost haunts Bengal again

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In a rerun of Singur issue, the opposition Congress, Trinamool Congress and ruling left front partner RSP joined hands to oppose a satellite township project near Siliguri, prompting West Bengal Urban Development minister Asok Bhattacharya to invite WBPCC Secretary Deepa Dasmunshi for talks and call off her dharna.

    Dasmunsi, spearheading the anti-land acquisition movement for the township on behalf of the Darjeeling district (plain) Congress and 'Bhumi Raksha Committee' of the opposing parties, was on a dharna, five km from here, since September 12 demanding the project be scrapped, causing traffic snarl on Noukaghat-Medical College Road.

    Bhattacharya, Chairman of Siliguri-Jalpaiguri Development Authority (SJDA), invited Dasmunsi for talks on September 19.

    Claiming that the compensation package for land losers was one of the best in the country, the minister expressed suprise over the flurry of protests against a project, to be built over an area of 302 acres, "which would protect the interest of land losers and an absolute need for the fast growing commercial hub.

    Ads by Google

    The CPI(M) also held a meeting within 100 metre of the dharna manch on Tuesday.

    Meanwhile, President and Secretary of the Bhumi Raksha committee Harasit Biswas and Jugolkishore Sarkar demanded that district Congress President, Shankar Malakar be too invited for talks.

    Alleging the minister was indulging in double standard by extending invitation for talks on the one hand and initiating a party rally close to the Dharna manch, Sarkar said the interest of landowners must be protected.

    SDJA sources earlier claimed the 302-acre plot was a non-fertile one, and the proposed township would house middle and lower middle class people.

    While the main townwhip was supposed to come up on 232 acres of land, the rest 70 acres was expected to have health, educational, sports and others amenities.

    Protectors turtned predatorsBy: S Jain | 18-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Mr R K Datta, how would you feel/react if your plot of land was snatched away from you in the name of "development" and you were paid only a pittance? Furthermore, imagine if that piece of land was your only source of sustenance, would you then bother about the State's development or your family's survival? Big fat businessmen and short-sighted, maybe even, corrupt politicians have come together to usurp/rob what is essentially someone elses' personal property and earn obscene rental income under the patently misleading and false pretext of "development". Mr Datta, unfortunately, the State has become a predator rather than a protector of its own weak and helpless citizens especially its farmers. This economic fascicism has to be strongly resisted. Otherwise tomorrow they will come and snatch your and my property for free.
    Singur Ghost to haunt WB for some timeBy: R.K.Datta | 17-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Civil Society in West Bengal will pay for tolerating Mamata Banerjee antics and now Congress following Mamata Banerjee foot steps. Pradesh Congress President Priya Das Munshi first make sure that he has 10 -15 leaders who have some credibility among people. Following TMC or joining with TMC will ultimately ruin Congress in West Bengal. It is a shame.Sonia Gandhi must not make the same mistake which Prakash Karat made.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.