Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Slow doesn’t win

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Shekhar Gupta’s ‘Babuji dheere chalna’ has rightly captured the Indian “slowness” syndrome. However, the roots of this malady can be found in the typical Indian childhood — in the morals we are taught, specifically that slow and steady wins the race. Further, our political class is as yet nervous about defying this “tradition”. Thus there is no question of dreaming big.

    — Rishibha Gupta

    Delhi

    We Indians are usually content to just plod along. Innovation and change thus pass us by. In India, even post-liberalisation, mediocrity is thus evident everywhere. Our penchant for delayed projects, moving slowly because we fear the unknown — such as speed — is a remnant of a past we couldn’t leave behind. India’s developmental dreams are thus compromised. On the ground, what confound infrastructural projects are archaic laws, conflicting interests and litigations. Therefore, even zones created with an infrastructural focus do not deliver.

    Ads by Google

    — L.K. Chawla

    Gurgaon

    Unmerited

    Let’s set aside the Indo-Pak joint statement at Sharm-el-Sheikh for a while. Instead, let’s start by questioning if there’s a need to talk to Pakistan at all. Whatever happened to then-External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s claim that, following 26/11, relations with Pakistan wouldn’t be “business-as-usual”? That’s clearly not the case, despite the fact that Pakistan has visibly done almost nothing to merit the ground ceded by India at Sharm-el-Sheikh.

    — Raghu Seshadri

    Chennai

    Dialogue matters

    The Indo-Pak joint statement and Manmohan Singh’s meeting with his Pakistani counterpart have sent out positive signals, notwithstanding the confusion and anxiety in various quarters about what exactly was discussed and what India has “conceded”. Frankly, de-linking terror from the dialogue process isn’t folly on India’s part. The PM’s statement in Parliament cleared the air on that — that bilateral dialogue can’t begin till the Mumbai attack is accounted for. Unfortunately, the subcontinent is still paying the price of the Cold War. Nevertheless, through the Cold War, the US and the erstwhile Soviet Union kept on talking to each to other to diffuse tensions.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.