Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

So what’s new?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • But the Glivec case is very relevant if the concern is Indian pharma industry’s future, and surely the government should be concerned about this. Nicholas Piramal is working to innovate on Glivec’s formulation. Section 3 (d) of the Indian patent law, which Novartis challenged, cannot give Nicholas Piramal a patent. Novartis is working on an anti-dengue formulation. Indian pharma companies may not want to innovate on Novartis’s molecule, which will be patented of course and produce a domestic patentable version. India’s pharma sector needs to grow out of its generic stage. But since its budget is much lower than that of Western MNCs, seeking patents on incremental innovation rather than developing new molecules is the best current strategy. That strategy receives no incentive from India’s patent law.

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.