Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘Social, not just economic viability should be yardstick’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mamta
    At Parliament with Budget papers.

    Borrowing from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s emphasis on “inclusive growth”, Banerjee said that the “Railways must set an example to promote “inclusiveness” in their functioning keeping the needs of all sections of “our fellow countrymen in our thoughts, decisions and deeds”. She even announced the setting up of an Expert Committee to advise her on “innovative financing and implementation of the so called economically unviable but socially desired projects”. She added that her ministry will identify places that have not seen any infrastructure development she will prepare a blueprint of how many such schemes can be implemented in the coming five years.

    But before she embarks on this plan, Banerjee would do well to examine a list of over 250 railway projects that have been pending for years, mostly because of being economically unviable. Many of these projects, announced for social or political considerations, have been languishing in Railway files for decades. Rail Bhavan officials admit that the fact that most of these projects have a negative rate of return is the primary factor behind them not taking off. Railway norms prescribe a positive rate of return of 14 percent before a project is started.

    Ads by Google

    Her plan, however, may be hamstrung by the fact that her ministry is struggling to sustain revenues since the past few months, has been forced to curtail freight targets for the current fiscal, and is staring at much lower cash surpluses and net revenues for the fiscal, largely because of the Rs 14,600 crore it has to shell out to implement the Sixth Pay Commission and the overall economic slowdown.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Rail Budget 2009By: D.A.Srinivasan | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Sir,Regarding he comfort of passegers travelling by sleeper class I would like to say that the reservation has lost its meaning in most of the trains.Short distance passengers, vendors. beggears and ticketless travellers encroach upon the space meant for the authorised passengers. T,T,Es. do not bother to restrict the entry of such trvellorsThis causes great inconvenience.Can our present railway minister ensure that the the comfort of the sllper class passengrs are protected.Srinivasan
    Will it be Done!By: Saurov | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Railways have been the key life line of the growth
    Roof for Railway PlatformsBy: V. Sivasankaran | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Let Mamata errect Roof for the entire platform length atall Railway Stations. In most of the stations, we can findthat passengers get drenched the moment got down from the train or while waiting for the train to board in. Before she do the book stalls, malls, entertainment etc let her give priority for this suggestion in the interest of the passengers safty
    Railway BudjetBy: Sampath | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The Railway budjer fulfilled only 50% of my expectations. Passenger tarif cut is ok but the freight tarif couldhave been raised by 0.5%. It looks as if the existing bumber of trains would be siufficient. We need more trains in the same route and we need more two ways...In the infracture field the RailWay is very poor.
    bad argumentBy: arun kumar | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward A strong person or organisation can only help lift deprived or weak.One who walks on crutches can never be of any help to other.I once again quote Late Sarabhai - "We need computers to grow more bread".This reply came when some one ask do we need computers or bread? Rail budget must address needs of passenger safety, comforts, modernisation, freight and for social upliftment we have HRD,and Social welfare Ministry. She failed to rise over partisan attitude and announced schemes tobe implemented in WB, while Orissa, Andhra, and region of J
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.