Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Some home truths about privatisation

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Vikas Dhoot

    That politics plays a role in deciding which public sector unit gets privatised is intuitively obvious but a new study by two professors from MIT and Indiana University throws up some compelling insights about India’s 16-year old and still fledgling privatisation programme. The paper, ‘The Decision to Privatise: Finance, Politics and Patronage’, co-authored by Nandini Gupta from the Kelley School of Business and Sloan School of Management’s Serdar Dinc, finds that not a single PSU in the home state of the Cabinet minister in charge of it has ever been privatised.

    By the time India opened up its economy in 1991, the 280-odd central government-owned firms (not counting the financial PSUs) accounted for 40 per cent of the country’s gross capital formation. While states have a plethora of their own PSUs, central government PSUs account for 85 per cent of the total assets of government-owned companies. In the 16 years since 1991, only about 50 firms have been listed or partially privatised or fully privatised.

    Ads by Google

    Between 1991 and 1995, the P.V. Narasimha Rao government sold minority equity stakes up to 20 per cent in 39 firms, and between 1999 and 2003, the NDA privatised 17 firms (some of which were already listed by the Congress) by selling majority stakes with management control to strategic investors. The Indian Express series, ‘Public Sector Unbound’, examined the current status of PSUs sold by the strategic sale route and found that all stakeholders, including workers, have gained by and large.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Public vs Private SectorBy: C S Jacob | 04-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward While one would concede that the private sector is more efficient than the PSUs, it is not borne by facts that with one percent change in ownership the sales and profit went up by ten percent. The recent happenings in the US do not give much comfort in the total ownership of finance and industrial houses by the private sector-for when they fail miserably the state has to intervene and take over instead of allowing the companies to go bust. What went wrong with PSU-policy of the 60s to 80s was giving it monopoly in the core sector and barring entry to private sector. The competitive environ that prevails now in India is healthy to the growth of both. One would agree with the author, that tendency to pamper workers in the organised sector, that accounts for only 7 percent of the total labour force should stop. Instead more needs to be done to workmen in the unorganised sector by giving them some safety net by way of a decent wage, healthcare and retiral benefits.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.