Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Spirit of cricket? It’s now merely a stick to beat people with

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Two captains, two very fine cricketers, Andrew Strauss and Ricky Ponting, are accusing each other of not playing according to the “spirit of the game”. Hopefully, they know what they are saying because I don’t and I don’t think anybody does. In truth, they sound as believable, as credible, as a starlet saying she did a nude scene because the “script demanded it”.

    We’ve been talking about this spirit of cricket thing for as long as I can remember. Every captain, when pushed into a corner, comes up with it. And yet, everybody, with no exception, violates one of the key clauses in the MCC’s spirit of cricket declaration which the ICC has adopted. Point 5 says it is against the spirit of the game to “indulge in cheating or any sharp practice, for instance:

    (a) to appeal knowing that the batsman is not out.”

    You probably see it twice every hour. In the Lord’s Test one of the Australian batsmen while swaying away missed the ball by at least eight inches and it clipped the helmet on the way. Straightaway Matt Prior went up, you’d expect that, but so did Andrew Strauss at slip. Now if there were two people on the ground who knew for certain it wasn’t an edge they were Prior and Strauss. Yet they were appealing vehemently for a catch and, by the sheer act of doing so, trying their best to induce an error from the umpire.

    Ads by Google

    Ricky Ponting probably does it a couple of times a day himself and I’m not sure there is a player in world cricket who hasn’t appealed convincingly knowing the batsman wasn’t out. And yet at the end of the first Test, Ponting told the media “We came to play by the rules and the spirit of the game. It’s up to them to do what they want to do”. It staggers me. The spirit of the game is now merely a stick to beat people with and I’m afraid anyone who believes otherwise is being naive.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    SledgingBy: PJ Skene | 05-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward The Australians have dragged the standard for player behaviour to the gutter. To be seen as masculine teams have had to develop their verbal abuse strategy to combat Australias and we have sacrificed the gentlemans ethic. The game is 350 years old and nobody has the right to change a core principle.
    Good articleBy: Mohan Subramaniam | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward One of the readers has pointed out that Adam Gilchrist appealed for a caught behind decision when he knew the batsman was not out. I hate saying this, but I have even seen Sachin Tendulkar pretend to be not out when he was clearly out on a few occassions. As Harsha points out everybody does it, good old "sportsman spirit" died with the likes of G.R.Vishwanath.
    Brillant Article !!!By: Vikram Pyati | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I always used to wonder why fielders who claim bump catches are castigated by the 'experts' as cheats, yet those who appealed when they were sure it was not out, escape any criticism.Remember the so-called saint of cricket - Adam Gilchrist - appealing for a caught-behind decision against Rahul Dravid in the Sydney test when there was daylight between bat and ball. People(mostly Indians) butchered the umpires, but no one accused Gilchrist. The article puts things in right perspective.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.