Suhas Palshikar

A crisis of political courage


Suhas Palshikar

Stamp duty: Order on Shanti Bhushan appeal reserved

Ads by Google

The Allahabad High Court on Friday reserved its judgment on an appeal filed by former law minister Shanti Bhushan in a case of alleged stamp duty evasion case in the purchase of a bungalow in Allahabad. Bhushan had appealed against the order of the Board of Revenue and the Assistant Commissioner (Stamps), both of which had held him guilty of evading stamp duty.

A single-judge Bench of Justice Sunil Hali reserved the judgment after hearing argument of both the sides. Earlier, on October 19, the court had stayed the recovery of the due amount after Bhushan went in appeal against the Revenue Board's order of October 8.

On January 6, the Assistant Commissioner (Stamp) had found Bhushan guilty of evading stamp duty and slapped a fine of Rs 27 lakh. In addition, Bhushan was also asked to pay the difference of Rs 1.32 crore, along with interest.

Bhushan's main argument was that the purchase agreement for the bungalow had been registered in 1966, while the norms related to circle rates came in 1969. Hence, the circle rates could not be applied with retrospective effect.

The sale deed for the bungalow, located on Elgin Road in Civil Lines area, was executed in November 2010.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus