Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Statistics over stories

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Across the world, many social programmes are now being evaluated on a randomised basis to the benefit of governments, policy planners and donor agencies like the World Bank etc. Probably the best example is the evaluation of the de-worming programme of school children in the district of Busia, Kenya (by Edward Miguel and Michael Kremer of Harvard University). Here, randomised evaluation led to the conclusion that the most cost-effective intervention to increase school attendance among rural children was providing de-worming tablets to the kids. Or closer home, where randomised evaluation by Sewa Mandir in rural Udaipur (by Esther Duflo, Rema Hanna and Stephan Ryan of Poverty Action Lab, MIT) confirmed that the digital camera intervention in rural government schools resulted in controlling teacher absenteeism and improved academic performance of the school children.

    As the country expectantly looks forward to many more meaningful social initiatives, it will be prudent to simultaneously plan for concurrent randomised evaluation of the new programmes.

    Ads by Google

    The writer is an IAS officer working in Rajasthan. The views expressed are personal

    Previous1234
    What's your point Mr. Rohit Kumar??By: Srinivas | 27-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward This article has little to add in terms of novel ideas for better implementation of NREGA. It does not justify why Randomized control trials (RCTs) which are expensive, and time consuming are better than any other statistical method for improving the programme design of NREGA. While predictably expressing a disdian for "experts" the author seems to forget that undertaking RCTs also requires considerable expertize ( (which evidently he must have acquired from Harvard or MIT). In that sense the purpose of this article is advocacy for a particular kind of expertise.I am not sure if Mr.Rohit is familiar with reservation expressed by reputed western academics about the efficacy of RCTs. Public interest will be better served if the author cared to develop a more balanced view based on better grasp of other various evaluation methods and limitations of RCTs, and leave the task of popularizing RCTs to World Bank
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.