Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Search
You are here: IE »   Story

Stay away from Kashmir, US report warns Obama

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Obama

    The incoming Obama administration should stay away from any ‘high-visibility’ focus on the Kashmir issue as it would likely evoke Indian resistance and risk fuelling Pakistani expectations of a settlement favouring Islamabad, a Congressional report has warned.

    The report, prepared by the Congressional Research Service for American lawmakers, said the fallout from the Mumbai terror attacks, being perceived as India's 9/11, could further complicate America's South Asia policy.

    The 19-page report titled 'Terrorist Attacks in Mumbai, India and Implications for US Interests', prepared mid-December for the US lawmakers -- the 111th Congress in particular, was released on Wednesday and a copy was obtained by PTI.

    In seeking to revamp US South Asia policy, President-elect Barack Obama and his advisors may face a key central question: Are conflictual relations between the region's two largest states primarily an India-Pakistan problem or are they mainly a Pakistan problem alone, it said.

    Any high-visibility US government focus on the Kashmir issue ‘would risk fuelling Pakistani expectations of a future settlement favouring Pakistan, thus in turn providing a motive for Islamabad to sustain pressure by ramping up support for Kashmiri separatists,’ it said.

    Express Specials
    INDIA MERI JAANBy: leslie | 04-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward There are so many Muslims staying in India earning their daily bread. I do not think that they feel insecure staying with people of other faiths. I also think for humanity to prevail people of all faith shud be made to leave together. Only because in some state Muslim are in majority does not give other country the right to send terrorists to "defend" Muslims. These so called people are just there to fulfill their selfish desires. I think people of J
    indian majority under threatBy: a | 13-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward why did indian muslims did not organise themselves in a big rally condemning mumbai attacks? all the muslims staying in bombay, eating its resources, should have shown at least this much gesture towards india, where they come to earn and make money. Instead they cleverly, especially many muslim actors, started questioning politicians and security? how could they establish relationship with pakistan and expect that government keeps itself ready to counter terrorism from pakistan. it is time now for majority in india to learn, that these actors are here only to make money and eat and buy houses in london and new york, and one day they all will even not a shed a tear for majority killed in bomb blasts attempted by their brothers from across the border.
    Pakistan is responsible for Bad Image of Muslims in India?By: gary | 10-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Pakistan was created for muslims but many Muslims chose to stay back in India and are leading thousand times better life than pakistani muslims. Pakistan is trying to create wedge between indian muslims and ther religions to weaken India and is responsible for Bad Image of Muslims in India.
    Kashmir is India's by right !By: HM | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Why can't there be an expectation of a settlement in favour of India ? Is this a pro Pak committee ?
    HM because we don't have any simpithy from muslims in IndiaBy: Govind | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward HM because we don't have any simpithy from muslims in India.After incidents like Babri mosque and Gujarat massacre we proves that creation of Pakistan is totally correct.if we do plebescite then 100% kashmiris living in Pakistan will vote for joining Pak while here in Indian occupied kashmir i think not more then 30% to 40% will vote for us.IT is our own policies which lead to this hatred.
    History and legal angleBy: Dayal | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward For the 436 princely states, the British had fairly returned power to those from whom they had taken it i.e. to the princes, who were free to choose between India or Pakistan. The Kashmir Maharaja and his two advisers, one Hindu and one Muslim, decided to keep Kashmir independent of Hindu India or Muslim Pakistan, but the Pakistani attack in 1948 forced the Maharaja to sign the Instrument of accession of Kashmir to India. Later India became a secular democratic republic. Since Pak had a non-agression(standstill agreement) treaty with Kashmir in 1947, Pak was not supposed to touch Kashmir militarily as per international law. There was a rebellion in Poonch only in 1947 against the Hindu King Hari Singh Pakistani army infiltrated tribals followed by armymen to help the rebels. That is why India went to UN with complaint and UN resolution maintained that “Pak will withdraw all tribals and nationals from Kashmir’ after negotiating the modalities of withdrawal with India.
    Why we keep runing from truthBy: Saleem | 09-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward if today there will be a plebiscite then it will be clear where they want's to join.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.