I want Ritalin! Added to the water supply in Washington, I mean. In a nation where every other 9-year-old seems to be medicated for attention deficit disorder, why do we refuse to take seriously the attention deficit disorder crisis afflicting so many of our political leaders?

Take John McCain. Immediately after 9/11, McCain shared the widespread view that the US should go to war in Afghanistan to take out those responsible for the 9/11 attacks. But by late November 2001, he wanted to “move on to the next country.” Uh-huh: “Next up, Baghdad!” Of course, we stayed in Afghanistan too, but McCain had got tired of it. By April 2003, he said that “nobody in Afghanistan threatens the United States of America,” so we could focus instead on the shiny new war in Iraq. “We don’t read about (Afghanistan) anymore, because it’s succeeded,” he explained in October 2005.

But Iraq started getting boring too, so now McCain has turned his restless attention back to Afghanistan — maybe because Barack Obama keeps hammering away at the issue. Obama, who’s been fairly consistent on Afghanistan for six years now, is either the rare politician who doesn’t suffer from ADD, or he’s smart enough to take his meds. On Tuesday, McCain released a “comprehensive strategy for victory in Afghanistan.” Previous claims of success were forgotten.

“The status quo is unacceptable,” McCain’s campaign declared, but, “McCain will turn around the war.” Right! Until we move on to the next country! (Remember, Iran is still high on McCain’s list of bright, shiny objects.) I don’t mean to pick on McCain here. ADD is rampant in the corridors of power, and McCain is far from the only sufferer. George W. Bush? A case too obvious to belabor. Congress could use some Ritalin too.

... contd.