You are here: IE »   Story

Stop exchanging dossiers

Discount Shoes
It’s not often this column gets a mailbox full of letters that agree with the views of your humble columnist. This happened last week. The gist of the letters was that India’s national interest was undermined by the Prime Minister when he allowed his Pakistani counterpart to bully him into that reference to Balochistan in the joint statement from Sharm-el-Sheikh. Proof of this came in last week’s ‘dossier’ of charges strategically leaked to The Dawn newspaper. The Government of India is now charged with being behind the terrorist attacks on the Sri Lankan cricket team and that police academy near Lahore.

When I read the charges listed in this so-called dossier I have to admit that my first reaction was...if only. If only Inder Kumar Gujral as Prime Minister had not wound down RAW’s subversive activities in foreign lands. If only the government of Atal Behari Vajpayee had revived them after the Kargil war. If only Dr Manmohan Singh’s first government had realised after the attacks began on Indian cities culminating in the horror of Mumbai that the only war that is going to be fought between us and our old Islamic foe is a subversive one. If there was the slightest possibility of another conventional war it would have happened after India’s Parliament was attacked and it would most certainly have happened after the attack on Mumbai.

Ads by Google

It has to be said that Pakistan’s leaders have been quicker to understand this than our own. When Pervez Musharraf’s Kargil misadventure failed miserably, it took him no more than a few months to change his tactics. By the summer of 2001, when he came to Agra for those sham peace talks, he had already enlisted the services of men like Maulana Azhar Masood and Hafiz Mohammed Sayeed. These were his new Generals in the war against India and if you listen to their interviews and speeches on YouTube you will find that they are refreshingly frank about their hatred of India.

I did a bit of cruising on YouTube before writing this piece and listened first to Maulana Masood’s rantings. He boasted about how the jihad could only end in victory because ‘we love death, we seek it out, they fear death’. He celebrated the destruction of the Bamian Buddhas, said that Jews were ‘weaker than mosquitoes and flies’ and mocked India for being a weak country. I then switched to an interview that Sayeed gave to the Waqt channel after his release in June. He was asked repeatedly about India and his response every time was to say that India was a duplicitous country that could not be trusted—”They pretend to have peace talks but they are never sincere. They don’t want peace”. These are the men who lead the jihad against India and they have the full support of Pakistan’s government.

When a democratically elected government replaced Musharraf, I must confess that even I nurtured a small hope that the subversive war against India would stop and peace become possible. After the attack on Mumbai, when both Asif Ali Zardari and Yousaf Raza Gilani, behaved like spokesmen for the Lashkar-e-Toiba, this hope died.

We will not defeat the Islamists by making gestures of peace like the one the Prime Minister just made in Egypt. You cannot make peace with religious fanatics who burn with hatred of our idol-worshipping land. The only way to defeat them is by fighting them at their cowardly level. I am not suggesting that like them we should start killing innocent people, but I am suggesting that we should find some way of decimating organisations like the Lashkar-e-Toiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammad.

President Zardari recently admitted that the Pakistani government had in the past bred and nurtured jihadi terrorists. If only he had taken this discovery to its logical end and shown that his government had no wish to carry on this dangerous practice. But, not only has he done nothing he has encouraged his ministers to state repeatedly that action can only be taken against the Lashkar-e-Toiba if India provides ‘proof’. And, when Ajmal Kasab started naming names and providing ‘proof’ Pakistani ministers said they had no faith in confessions to the Indian police. This is of a piece with the initial denials that there were any Pakistanis involved in the attack on Mumbai.

So, let us please stop exchanging dossiers and joint statements and concentrate our energies on finding some way of winning the undeclared war that is being fought against India. If talking peace was the only way forward, as the Americans like to tell us, why does President Obama sanction more and more troops for Afghanistan? Why are Taliban hideouts being bombed on a daily basis? Why not invite Mullah Omar and Osama-bin-Laden to Washington for peace talks instead?

 
 
Terror against India - need for new approachBy: Qadir Sultan | 28-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Our humble columnist needs to needs to understand, it is because of US support Pak is getting away with all its terror unleashed against India. The US till 9/11 covertly supported PAK against its terror against INDIA. After 9/11it is looking the other way since it needs PAK for its fight against Afgan terrorists.Pakistani Terror is a political project , Pakistan wants India to bleed since India helped formation of Bangladesh -which was a political project by India against Pakistan. India has not helped the srilankan Tamils to achieve freedom from Shingalese eventhough they suffered more injustice than East Pakistanis.Islam does not have anything to do with enimity and gopolitical rivelary between India and pakistan. Columist like Ms.Talveen who have personal hatred against noble religion called Islam write rubbish. Her ideas will not help India to win war against Terror.India has to adopt smart methods which will nutralise the terrorists using modern technology .
Reply to Mr. Qadir..By: Arun | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I agree Islam does not have anything to do with enmity and geopolitical rivalry, but the unfortunate fact is that Islam is being used to unleash terror acts to settle geopolitical rivalry/enmity.
Common senseBy: shiney | 30-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mr.Qadir - Tavleen has stated exactly what you are trying to state we need to find better ways to neutralise terror, so whats your problem? She hasnt expressed any hatred against any religion, she has merely stated facts and if facts cant be designed for everyone's liking.
Deluded CommentBy: Passerby | 30-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Are you deluded Mr. Qadir, Pakistan was created for the sake of this particular religion, it doesn't get any more geopolitcal than that...
hypocrisy is the themeBy: mj | 28-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward From the bird's view,its quite evident that the central theme of modern war as is waged by Pak against India or by US against Mid-east is HYPOCRISY which is euphemistically termed as DIPLOMACY. So lets hone our diplomatic skills and retaliate with full latent force by creating a cobweb of diplomatic cover-ups which would give cover fire to our attack on the nuisance-causers and their perpetrators, on our land. Lets check-mate them in their own court.
World power!By: Vishal Singh | 27-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Even after the mighty fall of the Indian conservative movement last election there are many who continue to agree with your viewpoint. I feel that for India to get the recognition it seeks from the world (or should I say the West)she should show the world it means business. Stop cowering before a terrorist sponsoring nation and stop this BS about non-alignment and take a position on the hot button issues facing the world.
Thank you Tavleen SinghBy: Saurav bhasin | 27-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Ms. Tavleen Singh, During the Nazi Germany, Press and editorials were used as the propaganda machine by Adolf hitler and his team.The same is being repeated in India since 2004 , Sonia Manio led Congress party has taken over India.But that was a dictatorship of Hitler. The sad part is that in the current circumstance the Democracy of India has been subjugated by Sonia Manio.Ever since Sonia Manio came, IBNLIVE(Rajdeep and his gang), all News papers have become propaganda machine of her regime.Amidst all this, there lies an Editor called Tavleen Singh who fights against this evil rule !.I only hope that nothing untoward happens to you(possibility cannot be ruled out) as you remain the last brave one not bought out by power and money by the Macaulian Anti Hindu British Congress party and their stooges.
Thanks for Your Courage!By: Hemant Shah | 27-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I have to admire the few analysts who are still calling spade a spade. Shekhar Gupta, the Editor-in-Chief of this exalted journal, would have us believe that the Balochistan reference was actually a great move by the PM and his team. Clearly truth is not what his interests are vested anymore. I note some others amongst the IE beginning toe this line too.Today Hindustan Times also took a shot at explaining why this move by the government is actually a great thing. I can see the media managers of the Congress led coalition working double time to make this dung cake seem like a gift to the nation. They are all out right now, working the phones, making promises of positions, awards and other largesses. I am simply glad that there are a few journalists and analysts who are still above being corrupted. More power to you and your tribe, Tavleen! The nation has some hope because of people like you.
Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Title:
Maximum characters allowed     
Comment:
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.