Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Suspect SIMI? Of course

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Javed Anand

    Two years later, at a gathering of 25,000 Muslim youths in Mumbai, SIMI reiterated that the time has come for Indian Muslims to launch an armed jihad in India with the establishment of an Islamic caliphate as the ultimate aim.

    Don’t believe any of them? What about SIMI’s own posters plastered in the by-lanes of Muslim mohallas across the country following the demolition of the Babri mosque, with an invocation: “Ya Ilahi, bhej de Mahmood koi  (Oh Allah, send us a Mahmud)”. Who does not know that the reference was to Mahmud Ghaznavi whom fanatics revere as a “But Shikan (Destroyer of Idols)”

    Which editor of an Urdu paper can disclaim knowledge of these inflammatory posters? Could it be that Urdu papers never received press releases from SIMI on their official letterhead with a logo depicting a Quran and an AK-47 perched on top of a globe? And who has not heard of SIMI’s open adulation of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, for both of whom India is Enemy No 3 after the United States and Israel?

    Ads by Google

    Let’s now turn to the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. It provides for a ban on any organisation that is inimical to the sovereignty and integrity of India, or is involved in terror acts.

    Are the blasts after blasts, in city after city of India in recent years, part of the “jihad” espoused by SIMI? The investigating agencies obviously believe this to be the case. Why else would SIMI activists be routinely detained, arrested, interrogated, charge-sheeted and put on trial? Admittedly, they have yet to establish the terrorism charge against SIMI activists before any court of law in any of the blast cases.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Suspect SIMIBy: Nandan Maluste | 14-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward My friend Javed makes a strong case for suspecting SIMI. However, he does not show that SIMI has acted outside the law of India. Those who defend liberal democracy must defend the right of others to disagree, peacably. Please see Shoma Chaudhary in Tehelka of 6 September for a fuller argument. The crucial point being that in all these years that SIMI has repeatedly been banned, the State has yet to prove its association with violence. That SIMI, or anyone else, has international links is not evidence of criminal or anti-national behaviour.Anyone who opposes due process of law is as guilty of impugning the Constitution of India as he who argues against democracy to achieve Islam. Or Hindutva. Or economic progress.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.