Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Sweet deal

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Rajeev Shukla
    Anybody following the domestic response to the 123 Agreement must be appalled with the criticism of the deal. The gains for India out of the final deal are much more than even what Dr Manmohan Singh promised on the floor of the Parliament on July 20, 2005.

    The concerns over India’s limited freedom in nuclear tests after the deal are self-indulgent at best. Can anyone expect the US to guarantee the supply of nuclear fuel without a reasonable assurance that it would not be used to manufacture nuclear bombs? On the contrary, India’s biggest victory of having gained all the benefits of a nuclear state, without having to sign the NPT, is being blatantly ignored.

    Some of the opposition to the deal is motivated by an ideological hangover that has lost relevance in today’s India. But I want to ask my friends who are opposing the deal: if a similar deal was offered to Pakistan, would they refuse it?

    Ads by Google

    Pakistan, on the other hand, has publicly complained about the deal, alongwith some handwringing about missing out on a similar deal for itself. It is also a big irony that the BJP’s NRI supporters in the US, who had lobbied hard for easing sanctions over India earlier, are criticising the leadership back home for opposing the deal.

    After years of negotiations, Manmohan Singh has succeeded in scripting the best possible deal for the country. The political class in India should come together to acknowledge this achievement.

    House of memories

    A perpetual dispute over its possession cannot take away the historical significance of Jinnah’s house in Mumbai.

    Shortly after Partition, Nehru sent the Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan to Jinnah’s residence in Karachi to find out his views on the house he had built and abandoned in Mumbai.

    The mansion, which is prime property today, was an imposing mansion in those days. Jinnah recounted to Panditji how he had built it brick by brick. He said that it was a piece of his heart and Nehru should not break his heart. Jinnah died shortly thereafter, but Nehru respected his feelings and the then Indian government gave the house on rent to the British High Commission.

    The Jinnah house was impeccably maintained by the high commission till the time of its occupancy, following which the house lay abandoned with a dispute over its ownership between India and Pakistan. Because of the dispute, the possession of the mansion passed on to the Saarc secretariat, which never bothered about maintaining it. Today, the house lies in criminal neglect.

    I have always been of the opinion that the possession of Jinnah’s house should either be handed over to the legal heir apparent of the mansion, or the Government of India should take responsibility for its maintenance. Now, Jinnah’s ageing daughter Dina Wadia wants to reclaim possession of her father’s bungalow and spend her last days here. The Saarc secretariat should heed her demand and give her possession of the mansion, on the condition she maintains it properly, without looking for commercial gain.

    The writer is Congress MP in Rajya Sabha


    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.