Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

T for Tapasi not Tata, Singur says no to Left

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The tragedy of Tapasi Malik’s murder in the compound of the Nano car factory, it appears, played a bigger role than the exit of the Tatas from Singur in the results of the Lok Sabha elections here. The ghost of Tapasi haunted the CPI(M) in village after village as the party faced a rout in the Singur Assembly segment that falls under the Hooghly Lok Sabha seat. The party, ironically, had instatedCPI(M) zonal committee secretary Suhrid Dutta — one of the teenager’s accused murderers and — as one of its star campaigners.

    The CPI(M)’s sitting candidate Rupchand Pal was trounced by Trinamool Congress nominee Dr Ratna Nag by a margin of 81,523 votes. This result can also be read as a nod towards Mamata Banerjee’s strong stand against forcible land acquisition for industry, and for the agitation she led to drive the Tatas out of Singur.

    In Singur Assembly segment, Trinamool not only outdid the CPI(M) by over 22,000 votes, but also increased its tally from the 2006 Assembly polls. Rabindranath Bhattacharjee of Trinamool had defeated CPI(M)’s Srikanto Chatterjee by a margin of 17,027 votes in 2006, which means Trinamool won over 5,000 more votes this time. Also, Trinamool even did better than the last panchayat elections in 2008, when it had won the majority of panchayat seats.

    Ads by Google

    Muhammed Ismail, 40, a daily wage earner says, “They murdered the girl and garlanded the accused. The CPI(M) destroyed agricultureand failed to set up the factory. Now we hope that Mamata will clean up the mess.”

    In political circles here, it is believed that the CPI(M)’s bid to campaign with Suhrid Dutta, who was bailed out just before the elections, backfired. Dutta and another accomplice were convicted of the murder of Tapasi by a lower court, but the Calcutta High Court granted them bail. Dutta then became the main campaign manager for the CPI(M) in Singur. The move, CPI(M) top brass accept, was a mistake. Balai Sabui, the CPI(M) district committee member in charge of Singur said, “People did not accept Suhrid Dutta. Our approach in handling the entire factory issue will have to be re-evaluated. Setiments about Tapasi Malik’s death worked more than industrialisation.”

    At their Bajemelia home, Tapasi’s parents Monoranjan and Molina Malik feel vindicated. “People have given their verdict. The CPI(M) showcased a murder accused, they took out a CD tarnishing my daughter’s image,” said Monoranjan, who campaigned for Trinamool.

    A section of youth, whose hopes for jobs in the car factory were dashed, have also started blaming the Left Government rather than Mamata Banerjee. “I used to work in the factory and now I’m jobless. The state Government failed to keep the industry. Why blame Mamata? She said, ‘let’s have the industry in 600 acres’,” said Monimohan Bangal, 27, whose family had accepted compensation for their land from Tata.

    Bolstered by their victory, Trinamool leaders in Singur are preparing for a renewed agitation. “The people here, especially SCs and Muslims, voted for us, overpowering the CPI(M)’s campaign of labelling Mamata Banerjee as anti-industry,” said Becharam Manna, party pointsman in Singur. “Next month, we will restart our agitation against forcible land acquisition for industry here.”

    CPI(M) In Retrospects By: Dr S Deman | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward (1) Joyti Basu’s unequivocal support for Industrialisation in West Bengal under the private ownership of means of production has sharpened the contradictions. (2) Unnecessary attack of Baba Ramdeo on nonissues;(3) Mr Bhattchrya's call for ban of Hartal
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.