Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

T for Tapasi not Tata, Singur says no to Left

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In political circles here, it is believed that the CPI(M)’s bid to campaign with Suhrid Dutta, who was bailed out just before the elections, backfired. Dutta and another accomplice were convicted of the murder of Tapasi by a lower court, but the Calcutta High Court granted them bail. Dutta then became the main campaign manager for the CPI(M) in Singur. The move, CPI(M) top brass accept, was a mistake. Balai Sabui, the CPI(M) district committee member in charge of Singur said, “People did not accept Suhrid Dutta. Our approach in handling the entire factory issue will have to be re-evaluated. Setiments about Tapasi Malik’s death worked more than industrialisation.”

    At their Bajemelia home, Tapasi’s parents Monoranjan and Molina Malik feel vindicated. “People have given their verdict. The CPI(M) showcased a murder accused, they took out a CD tarnishing my daughter’s image,” said Monoranjan, who campaigned for Trinamool.

    Ads by Google

    A section of youth, whose hopes for jobs in the car factory were dashed, have also started blaming the Left Government rather than Mamata Banerjee. “I used to work in the factory and now I’m jobless. The state Government failed to keep the industry. Why blame Mamata? She said, ‘let’s have the industry in 600 acres’,” said Monimohan Bangal, 27, whose family had accepted compensation for their land from Tata.

    Bolstered by their victory, Trinamool leaders in Singur are preparing for a renewed agitation. “The people here, especially SCs and Muslims, voted for us, overpowering the CPI(M)’s campaign of labelling Mamata Banerjee as anti-industry,” said Becharam Manna, party pointsman in Singur. “Next month, we will restart our agitation against forcible land acquisition for industry here.”

    Previous12
    CPI(M) In Retrospects By: Dr S Deman | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward (1) Joyti Basu’s unequivocal support for Industrialisation in West Bengal under the private ownership of means of production has sharpened the contradictions. (2) Unnecessary attack of Baba Ramdeo on nonissues;(3) Mr Bhattchrya's call for ban of Hartal
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.