Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Taking a call: Quota to mid-day meals

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • 2001: Make mid-day meal programmes in school mandatory

    Justice Balakrishnan says this judgement is “most special” to him. The two-member Bench, including Justice BN Kripal, ruled that mid-day meals be made “statutory”.

    1997: Impose a ban on bandhs

    Restriction on holding people and the city to ransom by calling bandhs

    In a severe indictment of then Bihar Governor Buta Singh, the Constitutional Bench, in a majority verdict (3:2), held that he had misled the Centre in recommending dissolution of the State Assembly. The Union Council of Ministers, they said, should have cross-checked before accepting his recommendation. The Assembly was dissolved on May 23, 2005.

    The majority judgement was passed by Chief Justice YK Sabharwal and Justices BN Agarwal and Ashok Bhan. Justices Balakrishnan and Arijit Pasayat took the minority view. Justice Balakrishnan disagreed on the main aspect of the petition, that whether the proclamation to dissolve the Assembly was illegal and unconstitutional.

    Ads by Google

    The majority judges inferred from the May 21, 2005, report of Buta Singh as the Governor of Bihar that he believed that 17 or 18 MLAs belonging to the Lok Janashakti Party (LJP) were moving towards the Janata Dal (United), meaning the latter could stake its claim to form the government. They described as arbitrary the Governor’s two assumptions that the move was itself indicative of various allurements having been offered to the LJP MLAs and that the claim that might be staked to form a government would affect the constitutional provisions and safeguards built therein, and distort the verdict of the people.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.