Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Taking dynasty out of democracy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Yes, we can be justifiably proud of our democracy. But if take a closer look, we will be able to see the infirmities and deformities within our system. Some of our present rulers have done everything to devalue institutions of parliamentary democracy. Some of the salient issues associated with the Rashtrapati’s election in July 2007 still remain unresolved. The Election Commission has become the centre of an unprecedented controversy. And we have a prime minister who is not even directly elected by the people. He prefers to play second fiddle to an extra-constitutional authority that has nominated him.

    Now the Congress has projected Rahul Gandhi as its future leader and prime ministerial candidate. ‘Ateet ke neenv par/Bhavishya ka nirmaan’ (Building a future on the foundation of the past) say Congress posters showcasing Rahul. The very first principle of democracy? equal opportunity undiluted by birth-related privileges? has been violated by this blatant hardsell of dynasty. The assumption that a member of the Nehru family need not have governmental experience or any record of service to the nation to be projected as the future prime minister of India is an insult to the logic of democracy.

    Ads by Google

    But many will ask, “Hasn’t America elected Obama, a single-term senator, as its president? What is wrong in Rahul, a single-term MP, becoming India’s PM?”

    The comparison doesn’t hold. In fact, it negates the case for Rahul as PM. Obama was “not privileged” when he entered the race. In contrast, Rahul is ‘overprivileged’. Obama came with the handicap of race, religion and class, which he overcame with a brilliant campaign that focused on issues that were anchored in a powerful message of change. Rahul comes only with the proverbial political silver spoon. He has so far not articulated his views on any issue with any degree of originality. And what plank of change can he offer? Change from Dr Manmohan Singh’s plank in governance? Change from his mother’s plank in politics? If Rahul does have an agenda of change, he has mysteriously kept it under wraps. Rahul’s rise to the top is a triumph of the slavish mentality, not only on the part of the Congress but also of a section of the media that has refused to do its job of questioning, scrutinising and criticising.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Taking Dynastry out of DemocracyBy: P.N. Sarin | 14-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward If we want to make India's democracy fool-proof, then we must raise the standard of our political parties. They are the root-cause of poor governance. Ideally speaking, our political parties should be democratic, transparent, accountable and led by people who are visionaries and expert in implementing policies. Members of Parliament should have a proven track record of public service. Merit and not dynasty should be the basic requirement of leaders of political parties.
    GoofBy: RP | 13-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Good article sir. But no mention of remote controls of RSS and senas controlling non dynastic parties
    Office of Profit billBy: Seema | 08-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward How can you forget about Office of Profit Bill?
    On Dynasty in democracyBy: kr prasad | 08-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Kulkarni, I congratulate your free speech . In this money game of politics, a Dynastic Family has an enormous advantage- they have more money than others, more power, more of their people planted in the media, in the industry and in the judiciary and in all departments of government that is why they win most of the time. It is also a fact that there are many in India who have no self-respect and a sense of self-worth - these are the ones who become slaves, The Dynasty uses precisely such people. (Just count the number of ministers in the congress government from Nehru-Indira Gandhi's time who were not slaves – only a handful). We must remember that our country has even been ruled by slaves in the 12 century – things have not changed much!Unfortunately in India all people may be equal, but all Families are not equal. There must be a law for debarring a family from having more than one person as PM or President for 5 generations.
    Taking dynasty out of democracyBy: kr prasad | 08-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward I cannot but agree with Mr. Kulkarni, I congratulate him for having the courage to talk against the dynasty. There should be more like him, if our country would have a worthwhile future. In this money game of politics, a Dynastic Family has an enormous advantage- they have more money than others, more power, more of their people planted in the media, in the industry and in the judiciary and in all departments of government that is why they win most of the time. It is also a fact that there are many in India who have no self-respect and a sense of self-worth - these are the ones who become slaves, The Dynasty uses precisely such people. (Just count the number of ministers in the congress government from Nehru-Indira Gandhi's time who were not slaves – only a handful). We must remember that our country has even been ruled by slaves in the 12 century – things have not changed much!Unfortunately in India all people may be equal, but all Families are not equal. There must be a LAW t
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.