Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Talks about talks

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • C.Raja Mohan

    American role

    The Bush Administration appears to have played a key role in working out a face saver between Beijing and the Dalai Lama. On April 21, the US Under Secretary of State and special envoy to Tibet, Paula Dobriansky, held extensive talks with the Dalai Lama — who was travelling in the US.

    The same day, in an article published in the pages of the Washington Post, Dobriansky insisted that a “meaningful dialogue” between the Dalai Lama’s representatives and Beijing is “the only way forward”.

    That the Bush Administration was applying pressure on the Dalai Lama to agree to talks was apparent from the first sentence in her article, “When I meet with the Dalai Lama today, I fully expect him to reaffirm his strong commitment to engaging Chinese officials in dialogue.”

    Dobriansky also urged “China’s leaders to address Tibetan concerns by opening a dialogue with the Dalai Lama, who has advocated a ‘middle way’ that embraces autonomy for Tibet within China and rejects seeking independence. “While Beijing’s initial reaction was to criticise the American “intervention” in the internal affairs of China, within three days, the official news agency Xinhua announced the turn-about on engaging the Dalai Lama.

    Ads by Google

    Getting the two sides to accept the principle of talks is the easier part. The Bush Administration might have to do a lot more to get the talks going. Nevertheless, the US diplomacy on Tibet should serve as an important lesson for the UPA government.

    Although the Indian Foreign Office was among the first to call for talks between Beijing and the Dalai Lama, the political leadership appears to have panicked at the thought of taking a steadfast and creative approach to the unfolding crisis in Tibet.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.