Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Tear down the walls

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • To see Mumbai the Bal Thackeray way, just hang around his house. The small middle-class colony he lives in is buffeted on one side by Dharavi, Asia’s largest slum, and on the other by Garib Nagar, an urban cesspool where Azharuddin, Slumdog Millionaire’s child star, lives. During the 1993 riots, Dharavi and Garib Nagar saw pitched battles between Hindu colony residents and Muslim slum-dwellers, each accusing the other of hurling lit, gasoline-filled bottles across the compound walls. This is the paranoia of Bal Thackeray, the paranoia that these “outsiders” will squat outside his house, erect tents, lob missiles and take over his city. The outsiders keep varying — from south Indians to Muslims, and now, to north Indians — but the solution is always the same: taller walls to keep them away, stronger arms to chuck them out.  

    This is the terrifying vision of Mumbai, variants of which the Shiv Sena-BJP alliance offers voters time and again. In the 2004 general elections, the Congress won all but one seat in Mumbai; in the 2004 assembly elections, the Congress-NCP combine was rewarded for pathetic governance with a second term; and in the recent general elections, the Shiv Sena-BJP once again failed to win a single seat (Mumbai North-Central, where Thackeray lives, was won by Congress’s incumbent, Priya Dutt). Mumbai’s electorate, around 60 per cent of whom are slum dwellers and 47 per cent “outsiders”, have spoken clearly. So have many “colony” dwellers, who, though appalled by the quality of the city’s governance, held their noses and voted for the hand.  

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Buy-out the media within air-conditioned wallsBy: Chanakya Niti | 18-May-2009 Reply | Forward I agree with your analysis of vote splitting between SS and MNS in Mumbai, you left out the low voter turn-out. Urban middle class in Mumbai did not vote (south-Mumbai had the lowest turn-out in the Nation barring some dangerous areas in Kasmir and Red corridor). Also your analysis in Delhi falls short - you never looked at buying-out of the opposition. Both BSP and SP candidates against Kapil Sibal (INC) and BSP against Chetan Chauhan (BJP) defected to CONgress at the last moment. Also a high voter turn out amongst Sikhs (a good sign) in favour of MMS played the part. Lastly, media's role in demonizing BJP and glorifying SRP can not be overlooked.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.