Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Terror at Taj Hotel could have ended first night itself

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mumbai
    The first police team enters the Taj on November 26 file
    Personal Loan

    Then came the second opportunity.

    00:38: The four terrorists trooped into Room 632 and stayed inside.

    00:53: One of them left and returned shortly.

    01:28: Another left the room and returned after a few minutes.

    02.34: All four left the room and fanned out, igniting fires on the sixth floor.

    Nangre-Patil, who continued to remain in the hotel security control room, was once again informed by security staff as soon as the four terrorists entered Room 632. This time, the DCP informed senior officers over the wireless and also sought more policemen. But according to Control Room transcripts of the wireless conversations heard by The Indian Express, Mumbai Police Commissioner Hassan Gafoor told Nangre-Patil to wait for backup.

    Ads by Google

    When contacted, Gafoor said: “There was no question of asking anyone to flee or not engage the terrorists. Nangre-Patil displayed exemplary courage. He told me, ‘Sir, I will do or die’, and I told him not to contemplate such things as the Army was on its way. Two constables with him had died, and he was lucky to have survived.”

    Despite repeated attempts, Nangre-Patil was unavailable for comment.

    The backup, in the form of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Quick Reaction Team (QRT), “striking mobiles” and “assault mobiles,” were already at the hotel. In fact, three “striking mobiles” with 18 armed policemen each, three “assault mobiles” with five men each, six police station mobiles with a minimum of four men each, as well as a Quick Response Team armed with AK-47 assault rifles — a total of about 120 armed policemen — were at the ground floor of the hotel, awaiting orders to proceed to higher floors.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    plz let the police to do the thing for which it has been created centuries agoBy: Vinay Singh(Retd CRPF Comdt.) | 21-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Indian express deserves appreciation for doing this research work but only a few people in india realize that we are overburdening the police day by day. creation of ATS and commondo force within the state police has become a fashion. some vested interest are also there because this provide with lots of unaccounted secret fun that remains unaudited, BUT IN LAST ONE CENTURY WE HAVE NOT MADE OUR POLICE CAPABLE OF DOING THE BASIC POLICING ACTS LIKE CONTROLLING GRASSROOT LEVEL CRIMES SUCH AS RAPE,DECOITY,TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS ETC. even then our policy makers want the police to fight the terrorist also,added responsibilty for which police neither created nor prepared. symultaniously we are making bad use of our PARAMILITARY FORCES like CRPF by forcing them to do normal policing duties intead of fighting exclusivey the menace of terrorism/naxalism. we must go back to the table and instead of overburdening the police empower the CRPF to handle the anti terror mechanism with responsibilty fixed.
    THE CLEAN CHITBy: Niranjan | 08-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward AND OF COURSE A CLEAN CHIT WAS GIVEN TO THE GOVT. I AM CERTAIN THAT THE CLEAN CHIT WAS GIVEN WITHOUT ASKING ANY QUESTIONS AND CONSIDERING ANY ANSWERS THAT WERE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE INVETIGATIVE PANEL! SHAME MAHARASHTRA, SHAME GOVT. OF INDIA. FOR ALLOWING SUCH THINGS TO GO ON.
    police roadmaptrashed on 26/11By: G. R. RAO | 06-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Kudos to your investigative reporting. It is highlyshameful that the chief secretary of the state waited for official communication from the police and wasted almost 1 hour before contacting thecentre. He cme to know about the strike at 9.30 p.m. through TV channel and he took up with the centre only at 10.20p.m. and then only he contacted New Delhi. Such actions or lapses are being patronised by granting extension of their services.
    Failure of Mumbai Police on the day of attack 26/11By: shanthanu | 05-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward When the question you have raised in your paper was raised by the opposition leader our Home Minister has the audacity of pointing earlier occasions of attack rather than looking into the failures of his own security men and assuring prevention of recurrence in the present case. If this callous attitude on the part of our Home Minister is not arrested I am sure there would not be any meaningful discussion in parliament. He should be asked to bemore careful in answering the opposition. PM should mend him to country"s needs.
    KudosBy: Ajay | 05-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Great piece of journalism, kudos to Indianexpress
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.