Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Terror gets local support, so no houses for Muslims: Surat real estate agents

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Claiming terror strikes like in Mumbai cannot take place without local support or contacts, Surat real estate agents and brokers have decided not to rent or sell houses to Muslims.

    This decision was taken at a meeting last Sunday which was attended by some 300 real estate agents, many of whom responded to SMS invites. They initiated moves to form an association, hoping to complete the process before the month ends.

    The Mumbai attacks prompted this meeting in Surat which was rocked by the discovery of bombs across the city after the July 26 serial blasts in Ahmedabad. After the bombs were discovered, activists of Hindu hardline groups had forced Muslims to vacate shops in the Varachha area of Surat — in Ahmedabad and Vadodara, Muslims find it very difficult to rent or buy houses and this has been their experience ever since the 2002 riots.

    Defending their move not to do business with Muslims in Surat, New Adajan Rander Road real estate agent Amit Tailor said: “We do business for a fixed rate. I have contacts with 150 estate brokers and we are all inter-linked. We cannot rule out the possibility of local support for terror attacks. Several local people were involved in the blasts in Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Jaipur, even the planting of bombs in Surat. We are not saying that all Muslims are terrorists. There are some shops in our area which have been rented out by Muslims. We want to control the percentage.”

    Ads by Google

    Naresh Patel, also an Adajan estate agent, said: “We will convince owners who have rented shops to Muslims to get them vacated. If they don’t do it, they will be responsible if anything happens. We want to control the percentage of Muslims with properties and shops in our areas. All real estate agents and brokers are with us, they have all taken an oath not do business with Muslims.”

    Praveen Bhalara of Varachha said: “We found that one Tanveer Pathan was arrested by Surat police in connection with the planting of bombs in Varachha. Tanveer used to work in an AC shop in Varachha and was familiar with the area. So we decided that shops should not be sold or given on rent to Muslims as they pose a threat. We don’t want to take a chance. We have even told groups in Varachha not to give jobs to Muslims youths.”

    When his comments were sought, Surat Mayor Ranjit Gilitwala, who is also the BJP MLA from Surat East, said though he was not aware of any such decision by real estate agents, he could do very little about it at an official level. For the sake of communal harmony in the city, Gilitwala said, he would call real estate agents and speak to them.

    Neha,wish you a communist conceptionBy: Neha jain | 28-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Considering the case of Surat,it is a particular case,however on studing the strategies of terrorism from Kashmir to Srilanka,i suppose a particular community to blame for its offence & sacrifice them for it,is not within the premises of a growing national Moral ie a safe & fast enviornment.I conceptualize that rather to inferior muslim in particularity,it would be nicer to probe in the problem as relevant to the particular situation viceversa NOT BLAME THEM BUT BRING AN UNDERSTANDING,through negotiation.
    Terror gets local support, so no houses for Muslims: Surat real estate agentsBy: Ali Urooj Shahi | 30-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward It's a juvenile move and cannot be justified at all. I think you are unaware that Muslims also do not support terrorism. You have picked up certain blacksheep in the community and projecting them as the face of Islam. The blacksheep are in every community. Name one community which doesn't have one. I am not saying this because I am a Muslim but as an Indian. You are instilling hatred for India-their motherland among Muslims of India who have fought with you against Pakistan. If you are going to take this move then you should lay off the 12-13% Muslims employed with the Indian army who fight against the common enemy. It is the time we fought against a common enemy not among ourselves on the basis of community. This step would be a disaster and the friends may turn foes.
    Not a wise decision..By: Satish Garg | 13-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward You will end up with nothing, Punishing all muslims can't be justified.. better you would have put back ground check process in place for muslim.. if a Terrorist become hindu and ask house for rent.. how would you know.. this won't cost per tenant and concrete step for verification check..
    Terror gets local support, so no houses for MuslimsBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 13-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward This is an unfortunate decision, because it affects innocent and patriotic Muslims very badly. This is in fact a fall-out of the global Islamic terrorism which unfortunately has support bases within the country. There is no point wishing away the fact that there are some very highly qualified and fairly well-off Muslim youth which are giving active support to the terrorists from across the border. The steriotype response to this decision by the realtors will be for the secularists and human rights activists to blame the BJP, RSS, VHP and other Hindu organizations, while this is a natural reaction of ordinary Hindus who do not know whom to believe and whom not.
    Good Move but it will hurt majority of Patriotic Musilms.By: Anand | 12-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Why you people not opposing the vast alienation of kashmiri pandits from Kashmir? is that not wrong? Is that not based on religion?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.