You are here: IE »   Story

Terror may be barbaric, cruel; never cowardly: Headley

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The trip from a strict Pakistani boarding school to a bohemian bar in Philadelphia has defined David Headley’s life, according to those who know the middle-age man at the centre of a global terrorism investigation.

    Raised by his father in Pakistan as a devout Muslim, Headley arrived back here at 17 to live with his American mother, a former socialite who ran a bar called the Khyber Pass.

    Today, Headley is an Islamic fundamentalist who once liked to get high. He has a traditional Pakistani wife, who lives with their children in Chicago, but also an American girlfriend — a make-up artist in New York — according to a relative and friends. Depending on the setting, he alternates between the name he adopted in the United States, David Headley, and the one he was given at birth, Daood Gilani. Even his eyes — one brown, the other green — hint at roots in two places.

    Ads by Google

    Headley, an American citizen, is accused of being the lead operative in a loose-knit group of militants plotting revenge against a Danish newspaper that published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. The indictment against him portrays a man who moved easily between different worlds. The profile that has emerged of him since his arrest, however, suggests that Headley felt pulled between two cultures and ultimately gravitated toward an extremist Islamic one.

    “Some of us are saying that ‘Terrorism’ is the weapon of the cowardly,” Headley wrote in an e-mail message to his high school classmates last February. “I will say that you may call it barbaric or immoral or cruel, but never cowardly.”

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    He should read Robert S. PayneBy: Devasahayam | 24-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Payne stated in "Massacre" (account about "Operation Searchlight"--which Banglas consider as a Naziesque act of state-terrorism) that dictators are always cowards--which has also been revealed by this tout Gilani through his attempt to obfuscate!
    Terror may be barbaric, cruel; never cowardly: HeadleyBy: Abdulmajeed Khan Advocate | 23-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Sir,The authentic books including written by Mr. Jaswant Singh, the than BJP Leader claimed perfectly right, that for two nation theory of India and Pakistan, foundation stone is laid by the Mr. Pendith Jawaharlal Nehru and Mr. Sardar Patel not by Mr. Ali Mohammed Jinah. The King Baabar arrived in India, with 1200 Muslims and todays Muslim populations in India, Pakistan, and Bangla Desh are all converted from Hinduism to Islam. Name Hindu means, we Indians residing near Indus water. Every person residing at Indian soil is Hindu. Name terrorist can%u2019t be labeled upon the person, called by US Headly or any one. There had been British Intelligence Chief, when he died, he had been Given God of Honour by the Russian Government and the than Russian President Mr. Mikhail Gurbachuf attended his funeral, because he had been KGB General. So one side Story should never be approved.
    Pakistan IdeologyBy: RIAZ HYDER | 23-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Pakistans Ideology has been of terror since its formation, it is jealous of Indias development and prosperity.. Pakistan is responsible for terror culture where this industry has been prospering since years.When a child grows parents bear or enjoy the fruits.I dont know what the parents have when a sibling is terrorist. These terrorists are the brain child of Pakistans Ideology, why we Indian should bear. We have a ugly neighbour called Pakistan, a rogue neighbor formed on ideology of terror.I think it is the Ideology which have been adopted . Lack of Development,education prompted Pakistan to hunt money by supplying these terrorists. They intentionally got exploited for money. They believe they are the Custodian of Islam and that has become the fools world.
    Hindu terror or Islamic terror...there is a differenceBy: Roy | 23-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Hopefully my article gets published....I am no supporter of the BJP never been & never ever will....but the fact is Islamic terror is something not digestable...their justification like the demon in the article is ridiculous. There are no moderate Muslims...thats the truth....country of religion put to a Muslim & for certain the religion comes first even if it is detrimental to the country.
    Hindu terror or Islamic terror...there is a differenceBy: aseem sharma | 23-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Its not true that there are no moderate muslims... i completely agree that there is a faction which may put religion first over even the nation/humanity, but at the side of it there is also a moderate faction, which believes in dvelopement and peace. The important thing is that 'the moderate faction (true for any religion) is always quiter and rises to the challenge a little late' and these barbarians take advantage of their silence by using the name of religion. May be its the high time that the moderate faction wakes up, takes charge, disowns and cut all ties with these barbarians completely, otherwise these barbarians may continue bringing bad name to Islam
    What is USA uptoBy: ReadingtheTiming | 23-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Knowing fully well what Pak stands for, an Obama wants China (which is helping a terrorist nation build a bomb) to take lead in maintaining stability in this region... Look at the timing of Headley and Rana leads. It is purely to take mileage in their Af-Pak strategy arm-twisting them to get more exposed to India if ISI/Army does not cooperate with USA... India must ensure we do not succumb to any big powers and their guillible strategies.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.