Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Thai tug o’war

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • So where’s the opposition? Are they entirely unfit to rule? Unfortunately, they have focused much of their energy on getting Thaksin out rather than developing a concrete platform to get a new and acceptable candidate in. The Yellows — the People’s Alliance for Democracy or PAD — currently focus on essentially disenfranchising the rural north; this will naturally not garner any support and in fact will only strengthen the Thaksin faction. And it isn’t certain if any other (read non-Thaksin) progressive parties and alternatives can come to power through the electoral system ; so will Thailand have to go down the well-worn route of its old politics, where the only winner will be the old order?  

    This is a very important battle for Thai democracy. There are strong arguments for the constitutionality of Thaksin’s sentence, and he should thus serve it. Still, his party enjoys enormous support and there are members within it who are capable of leading the country; however, they are banned from participation in politics. That, in contrast, needs to be lifted. Finally, the genuine grievances over the 2006 coup d’etat need to be addressed; free and fair elections will go some distance towards doing so. 

    Ads by Google

    Electoral battle-lines — city versus north — have been laid out without much attention to the country’s largely Muslim, rural south. Should another party want to stand against Thaksin’s, at least 30 per cent of the south might be convinced to vote for it. Thaksin has never been and is unlikely to be their choice — the 2005 election results showed that. Although criticism of Thaksin focused on what appeared to be his mixing of business and politics, his true failure was how he dealt with Muslim insurgents and protesters at, among other places, the town of Tak Bai. Crushing that popular uprising required one of the bloodiest operations undertaken by the Thai security forces. (Thaksin, who had assumed emergency powers to deal with the insurgency, has stated that he doesn’t feel accountable for these. Human Rights Watch’s head, disagreeing, has called Thaksin “a human rights abuser of the worst kind”.) 

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.