Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The 5% formula

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The decision taken by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs on Monday, to move ahead on disinvestment of the National Thermal Power Corporation or NTPC, is the first such move by the second avatar of the United Progressive Alliance and, if only as such, deserves closer scrutiny. It takes on more significance when it is paired with a reading of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s speech at Scope’s “excellence awards”, a function to recognise government-run enterprises and their employees that have done exceptionally well; the PM spoke then about how listing public sector companies on stock exchanges had served the government and consumers well in the past. The divestment of NTPC announced was of 5 per cent, through a “follow-on public offer”; 10 per cent has already been sold off. This is a little less than what was expected (expectations were of another 10 per cent), and is limited to NTPC and another power-generation utility, the Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam, which is co-owned by the government of Himachal Pradesh, rather than across a broad swathe of such public-sector utilities, as many had hoped. But it nevertheless serves as a useful signal of the government’s continued commitment to the privatisation process, half-hearted though it might appear.

    If UPA-II has taken a decision to defer big-ticket privatisation, for whatever political or ideological reason, then that is an error. However, even within these parameters, there are steps that can be taken. Lowering government holding in certain public sector companies, especially those that are doing well and are properly valued by the markets, will aid in increasing efficiency. Yet others need to be listed for the first time, which is in itself a method of instilling some market-related discipline to their operation. Other small road-blocks have already been removed: for example, a debate that helped delay earlier such moves — on whether the proceeds should stop going, as has been the practice since 2004, to the National Investment Fund — appears to no longer be seen as sufficiently problematic.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Story of IndiaBy: Straight Talk | 22-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward This is the story of India - a few good steps, but too little and too late.
    It is a progressinve step though much delayedBy: L.C.Bilandani | 21-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The decicision of Cabinet committee to divest 5% of equity of select few companies is a welcome step though this should have been done by UPA- 1.The disinvestment process should be done more vigourously and pushed far more that 5% to release tax payers money for infrastructure projects.But care should be taken that the amount is not divested to fund deficiet of government budget.If this is done we should take important infrastructure projects on the fast track.And among infrastructure the once that deserves proiority should be which gives a big push to exports and employment generation.If only the govt. keeps an open mind without prejudice and bias then the Interlinking of Rivers deserves top priority as it solves almost all the problems of country at a stroke.There will be no flooding,no drought,good agri based economy,plenty of water for industry and human consumption,no unemployment and a new way for transportation by easing road and rail concentration.Gain for all and loss for none
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.