
There seems to be only one direction the insurance industry is headed: Down. Every other day we hear stories about how, in the pursuit of higher commissions, insurance agents are selling one investment product ULIP after another and not life cover term policy. Households pay exorbitant upfront commissions that go as high as 40 per cent for a 20-year product, but the agent either disappears after three years or returns to churn the money into a new 20-year policy. Much has been written about this but most of the industry, regulator Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority IRDA and the government have nothing to say or do.
What8217;s new is a two-day old email from an alert doctor. Here8217;s what he wrote: 8220;I would like to draw your attention to a leading insurance company8217;s strategy. Recently, its agent offered to pay in cash if I disclose my diabetic patients8217; names to the insurance company. Also, if anyone takes this insurance policy offered to diabetics only, additional cash will be paid. And if more patients take the policy, other offers such as a Malaysia trip are offered, according to slab.8221; He concludes saying, 8220;Doctors are not expected to reveal diagnosis of a patient unless asked by court of law.8221;
An obnoxious mix of regulatory breach and a Ponzi scheme 8212; the insurance agent, I8217;m pretty sure is a direct selling agent as well. This could be merely a rather enthusiastic enterprising? agent taking commission-maximisation to a new orbit and like a good entrepreneur, sharing it with doctors. And then, maybe not. Maybe, we8217;re ignoring the other stakeholders in this business 8212; government, IRDA and industry 8211; and allowing them to go lightly, even scot-free, as we condemn the agent. For, don8217;t the government and IRDA know what8217;s going on here? If they do, what are they doing about it? If they don8217;t, just which armchair world are they living in where right under their noses, a whole industry is turning insurance into a high cost investment business or, as the letter implies, seeking out high cost, high premium individuals illegally?
The poor agent is only the face of the industry, the last and potholes filled mile that needs to be regulated. And perhaps we8217;re being rather harsh on him, questioning his intention while all he8217;s doing is what any rational being would do 8212; sell what sells, earn the maximum return per unit of effort. Quite like Delhi8217;s Blue Line bus drivers who, caught in an incentive system devised by their politician-police employers, are leaving graves and cremations behind them every day. Like the drivers, insurance agents too need to be regulated. But like bus owners, the insurance industry too needs to be brought under the magnifying glass 8212; why create such an incentive structure in the first place?
IRDA is no different from those whose mandate it is to regulate Blue Lines 8212; bad laws, poor industry practices, non-enforcement. These practices, the worst of the West so far it8217;s getting worse 8212; see how Wall Street is turning life insurance into what BusinessWeek calls 8220;Death Bonds8221;, have been imported lock, stock and barrel, without trying to improve, innovate or see them from financially illiterate consumers8217; point of view. What we end up with is a mockery life insurance, a great product and perhaps the first financial instrument a household should be buying. And just as Blue Lines are leaving crushed bodies and tears behind them, the agent-industry-IRDA combine, while making holy noises of increasing insurance penetration in the country, is leaving a huge mass of uninsured or under-insured consumers.
8230; And here8217;s the solution
The problem is not going to go away, so IRDA and finance ministry need not behave like ostriches. And all is not lost, there are solutions 8212; provided those who have been mandated to protect consumers8217; interests dare to walk the untrodden path, using innovative practices rather than imported ones. But innovation has a tendency to destroy existing orders, so we can rest assured that incumbents will oppose any such move.
The simple solution: stop upfront commissions 8212; now. I8217;m sure the industry will be up in arms and will present 2-hour power points saying how absurd the idea is, how journalists don8217;t understand finance, how the industry is not in the business of fleecing. Their most potent argument is likely to be on how upfront commissions are global norms and benchmarks, how India can8217;t be different from the way the rest of the world functions. But finance ministry will have to ask them just two questions. One, why do they want 20 years8217; commissions paid upfront when the product servicing is going to end in three years? Two 8212; and this needs a leap of faith and the conviction to fight entrenched, fossilised ideas 8212; this model is not working in India, does the industry have an alternative? If not, end it 8212; this legal rip off has gone on for far too long. Global benchmarks be damned.