Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The chatteranti

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • To be fair, it is easy to see where this rage is coming from. These attacks have brought terror to the doorstep of the classes which had long divorced and insulated themselves from our very system of politics and governance. Over the years as our governance has declined, or failed to keep pace with our society or economy, all of us learnt to become individual, sovereign republics. We send our children to private schools, get treatment only in private hospitals, have our own security in gated communities, never need to use public transport, even own our own diesel gensets to produce power, and in many parts of the country, arrange our own water supply, either through our own borewells or tankers. Then we suddenly get hit in one area — physical safety, law and order — which is still entirely in the hands of the government. Knowing how thick-skinned our politicians are, and believing all the most horrible stereotypes about them, we see no possibility of changing them. So we now look for desperate measures: compulsory military training, conscription, NSG for every city. The armed forces, we say, are the only institution that can bring about this change. Pakistan has been owned by its army since its creation and see how much worse its law and order is, how the country suffers from daily terror attacks by its own, and how large swathes of its territory are nothing but extension campuses of its most notable contribution to the modern world: a university of jihad.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext2345
    What makes the voters to opt for the '49 o'?By: VYSHNAVINEELAKANTAPILLAI | 04-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward the reason why most of the voters opt for "49 O" is the dirty politicians who are found in our society. the citizens of today are highly aware of their voting right. it is the first and foremost duty.if politicians are really clean why should the citizens opt for it? i would always support the view that "49 O" because it enhances the citizen to enhance its right at the same time it also helps him to show his anger towards the candidate whom he trusted that he would do allot in the previous election. right now most of the candidates think that the voters are use and throw type. they just use them during elections and throw them when the candidate wins the election. i am not blaming the entire candidate who contest the election but there are exceptions too. so this '49 o' helps the candidate to show his anger and frustration and to teach a lesson.it is hard to find a clean candidate now that is why we need 49 o..
    49-OBy: Sanjay Ranade | 31-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward 49-O is of course not part of the Constitution of India. It is part of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961. It reads - 49-O. Elector deciding not to vote. -If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as Require under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark....….However, even if the 'no votes' are more than the 'winning' votes, it does not make any difference on the election result.
    Intectuals on saleBy: manmohan kachru. | 14-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I eagerly watch 'walk the talk' of mr.Gupta but he seems to be having a paid Agenda
    May be the solution!!!By: saulin vinit pratap | 14-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Only way outI have a few suggestions... I am not sure how these could be taken forward.Nominate a nuetral/non political committee for:1. Every Minister- state or central should be given a objective or a task cut out for 6 months to 1 year. If he achieves he stays or else he is kicked out.2. Corruption is rampant. Stop bribing.3. Respect our armed forces
    What is he talking about? By: Amar | 14-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I was looking for any concrete action plan from this so called senior journalist in his entire write up only blaming like a sore loser seems to be getting aid from Dawood to bad mouth Indians! I know Indian express is competing with CNN, Times, NDTV et al which are funded by outside elements. Looks like Express has joined this rat race who is best in ditching India!!!! Very well indeed, please proceed to make more money.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.