Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The Chawla factor

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Jaswant Singh must also explain to the nation why he chose to make this crucial revelation at the eleventh hour. He could have made this statement at any time in the past if he was indeed privy to this truth for all these while. The truth is that BJP made a mistake during the Kandahar episode and instead of owning up to it, the party is trying every trick in order to wriggle out of the controversy. The party must introspect and put an end to this web of lies.

    Stop the shoes

    It is high time that the practice of forgiving those who throw shoes at public leaders was stopped. It has grown beyond a mere cause of embarrassment and will soon reach a level where even state assemblies or Parliament might witness independent MLA or MPs hurling a shoe at the chair or any other leader. Stringent action must be taken against those caught making this mischief.

    Ads by Google

    I agree with BJP’s Balbir Punj that prime minister must not forgive anyone who hurls a shoe at him. The office of the prime minister is an institution that represents all Indian people, so is the office of leader of Opposition. Any attempt to throw a shoe at them — that too for nothing but cheap publicity — must be severely punished. Those who try to repeat this act in the legislature must have their membership revoked immediately.

    The writer is a Congress MP in the Rajya Sabha

    Previous12
    Rajiv Shukla 's farceBy: Dr.Meera | 03-May-2009 Reply | Forward I hate to be so direct but if Rajiv Shukla's own child was one of the hostage and if the life of his child was pitted against three terrorists merrily holed up in Indian jails and treated as VIP guests for years on end without any trail ,would he still use the same language?Would he agree to loose his child to protect such terrorists /Secondly , Does Mr.Shukla have any status to take on people like Jaitley ?
    Chawla's FactorBy: subodh | 03-May-2009 Reply | Forward Rajeev Shukla has cheek to compare Navin Chawla with Krishnamurthi. Everybody knows the background of Chawla, his indictment by Shah Commission for his misuse of power during the emergency days. Justice Shah even said that he is not fit to hold any public post. In spite of that, he was appointed as election commissioner. Now he is talking about everybody respecting the Chawla as Election commissioner and reminds of the national interest. This reminds me of the hindi proverb, Cat eating 100 rats and going for haj,Regards,Subodh
    Pot Calling the kettle Black! By: Shirish | 01-May-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Mr Shukla,Your take on Kandhar amounts to pot calling the kettle black! It is your own party which needs to do a serious introspection on this issue and stop the web of lies. The duplicity and crass opportunism which congress has shown on this national tragedy called "Kandhar" will cost you dear in these polls.When the crisis was 'on', your party openly egged on the relatives of the hostages to stage tamasha in Delhi. Your party warned the govt that it (govt) will be held liable if even one passenger dies at Kandhar!! You declared that the only thing mattered was passenger safety, nothing else!! Today, you DONT EVEN MENTION THE PASSENGERS?? You say BJP made a mistake. May the country ask what mistake?The 170 passengers included several women and children.Should they all have been allowed to get blown up at Kandhar on 1st Jan morning (what IB intercepts had confirmed)?? Would the congress party then have celebrated?? Learn from your own home minister Chidambhram who is the only guy who had the courage among congressmen to admit "yes, it was an impossible situation. Innocent lives were at stake". Stop politicising this issue. It is only going to adversely affect your poll prospects which have already been marred by one Mr Q.
    what to say?By: madhuri | 01-May-2009 Reply | Forward how one can contradict own view in the same column? in frontfoot of 1/5/09 rajeev shukla mentions at one place that arun jaitley has no love lost for navin chawla, and misses no opportunity to attack him, disgracing the fact that in this media age, the EC can not take sides or harass any party. and in forth paragraph he mentions the Congress never made any attempt to question the conduct of the outgoing CEC N. Gopalaswamy throughout his term, though everyone knew of his closeness to BJP’s LK Advani. Congress knew that accusing Gopalaswamy for any lapses would be tantamount to denigrating the credibility of EC and harm national interest. by mentioning this is he not putting a question mark on Ex CEC? one more question, are we really living in an ideal situation where all independent institutions are working independently that to when the appointing authority to such highest posts is government, lead by political party, is it possible for even political parties to remain in an ideal condition?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.