Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The final McMahon Line

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Ajey Lele

    The Shenzhou 7 spacecraft, launched aboard a 19-story Long March 2F, marked China’s third manned spaceflight and comes a mere five years after its initial 2003 lift-off. This riskiest of spacewalk was monitored and supported by five satellite tracking ships: four ships in the Pacific Ocean and one in the Atlantic and by space telemetry network supported by some 20 terrestrial surveying stations.

    The Shenzhou has no space station to dock with, but China intends to remedy that; it intends to build its own space station in the very near future; Shenzhou missions are expected to start work on the project, beginning with the very next launch: Shenzhou 8 is expected to carry a small “space laboratory” with it as payload. Shenzhou 9 will go to the space as an unmanned mission, and will dock with this laboratory, carrying additional material; and subsequently, Shenzhou 10 is planned to be launched with three astronauts on board who will complete a small space station complex. All this is scheduled to happen within the next 12 to 18 months.

    Ads by Google

    While these demonstrate China’s determination to extend its space programme, which brings it political and scientific benefits, what is very important to remember is that China’s space programme has also a very major military dimension. The world was shocked when, in January 2007, the space programme in combination with the military tested an anti-satellite weapon. The international community correctly interpreted this as a clear indication that it would not hesitate to weaponise outer space. Many in the world, including India, expressed regret through official channels about the test, but it appears that China has not been particularly bothered by the diplomatic firestorm. Today, as domestic problems multiply — the uprisings in the Uyghur and Tibet, problems with melamine in milk — successes like this are useful to demonstrate, both domestically and internationally, that China is among the first rank of powers in the use and development of advanced technology.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    India is not behind ChinaBy: Abhishek Dwivedi | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward NASA, ESA and ISRO protested China's targeting of a satellite not because of fears of a new military threat, but because the debris generated by the blast can collide and damage other satellites. ISRO's chief Mr. G Madhavan Nair has publicly stated that India too can easily replicate China's test, but it chooses not to be irresponsible. India is actually ahead of China and even Russia in the field of remote sensing satellites, which can also be used for espionage. China is often forced to rely on foreign nations for remote sensing data. Another area which India is actively pursuing is hypersonic vehicles, of which ISRO has already conducted a successful ground test. So, it would still be premature to write-off India in the military use of space, compared to China.
    The final McMahon LineBy: S Kiran | 30-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Thanks Mr. Lele, a nice writeup.
    space technologyBy: nike | 30-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Deeds not words !
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.