Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The ghosts of 1971

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has wisely decided to seek US and UK help in the investigation. That will expose the extremist inspiration for this uprising and the likely external support it received. Her government has indicated its willingness to examine the feasibility of transit rights for India through Bangladesh territory and promised to cooperate in the elimination of terrorist camps in Bangladesh and contain the operations of the ISI in and from Bangladesh territory. It is also logical to expect more meaningful economic cooperation between India and Bangladesh. It should be noted that the interim army regime had under consideration many of these initiatives. Thus, for the Islamists, both the Awami League government and the present army are enemies. That explains why a large number of army officers were targeted with such brutality.

    Some elements in Bangladesh with deep Wahhabi Islamist roots going back to the 1971 civil war have since then developed strong links with Al-Qaeda or with the ISI. It will be unrealistic to expect that they will give up their jihad after the failure of this uprising. There is a reasonable probability that with the Awami League government and a professional army in place the Islamists will try to make it into a battlefield for spreading jihadi Islam.

    Ads by Google

    The Obama administration is placing increased emphasis on Indonesia and Southeast Asia in its efforts to connect with gentle Islam. Bangladesh is an important transit point for jihadi operations in Southeast Asia. There is a good case for the US, the European Union, Japan, India, Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries to support Bangladesh politically, economically, militarily and in terms of intelligence cooperation.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    BIRTH OF BANGLADESH IN 1971By: S.Suri | 07-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward With the benefit of hind-sight, one can now say that India's intervention in the creation of Bangladesh wasn't right. East Pakistan was a big pain for the West Pakistani rulers. They experienced many logistical problems in administering their Eastern half, separated by thousand miles of Indian Territory. East Pakistan was constantly battered by cyclones/natural calamities. It was dependent on the western half for everything. The standard of living of its people was much below its western counterpart. Pakistan was glad to rid itself of this liability and thus became a majority urdu-speaking country in1971. It allied itself with the Arab Islamic block and received generous financial and military aid from them. Bangladesh has had brief spells of democracy in between military dictatorships. After Sheikh Mujibur Rehman's assassination in 1975, its ungrateful military rulers turned hostile towards India, aiding anti-Indian forces based there. We are thus back to square one.
    All the Actors of 1971 War [Gandhi, Mujeeb and Bhutto] are died with shameful death.By: Akash | 05-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward All the Actors of 1971 War [Gandhi, Mujeeb and Bhutto] are died with shameful death.that war was only for disintegrating Pakistan but bangladesh didn't join India.Now Bangladesh is becoming new enemy of us
    Yah we didn't get any benefit but another enemy after 1971 warBy: Ajay | 05-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Yah we didn't get any benefit but another enemy after 1971 war.That war is because of our intelligence agency dramas.
    Learn to live in prideBy: Dee | 07-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward And why u people go far to see enemies outside the country. What these Madrsa inside the country are doing?? U are buying the plot of Congress and ignore the reality. Can't u see - whole of Asia or world is under serious threats of Islam or Taliban (Same thing). If India can't control the tiny slumcountry 'Bangladesh', how will we fight against Pakistan and China - if needed. A country's fundamental duty is to save its citizens. Come out of well- see other nations how China and US established as world power. The best bet was to keep Bangladesh under Indian control. And stop making any interference through others' deaths. Considering this the most shameful death was of Rajiv Gandhi.
    The ghosts of 1971By: Aravind | 05-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward An excellent factual article. That was the time when the US had supported Pakistan with adventurism reaching up to the present situation. It is high time that the US understood and took it more practically. Bangladeshi people made their choice. Bangladesh is a small country with excellent prospects; let us all hope they do not get inflcuenced by evil elements. For India, a prosperous and secure Bangladesh is of our best interest.
    But we even didn't have resolve our border and water issue with themBy: Akash | 05-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward But we even didn't have resolve our border and water issue with them.We want's them to be slave of us and acknowledge what ever we say.Bangladesh is Muslim country which didn't join India after there separation from Pakistan.In this way they are a symbol of Two nation theory from which we all are allergic.On the other hand Pakistan have never become a subsidiary state of India and now also a nuclear nation.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.