You are here: IE »   Story

The law on impeachment of judges

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • On Monday, 75 members of the Rajya Sabha submitted a signed motion for impeachment of controversial Karnataka High Court Chief Justice P D Dinakaran. Maneesh Chhibber takes a look at what the process entails:

    What is impeachment?

    A member of the higher judiciary, which means the Judges and Chief Justices of the Supreme Court of India and the state High Courts, can be removed from service only through the process of impeachment under Article 124 (4) of the Constitution on grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity. In India, there is no other process by which a Judge can be removed from office before his term comes to an end. However, the process is very cumbersome.

    Who decides if a Judge should be impeached?

    As per the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, a complaint against a Judge has to be made through a resolution either by 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 Rajya Sabha members. After the MPs submit a duly signed motion to this effect to their respective presiding officers — Chairman of the Rajya Sabha or Speaker of the Lok Sabha — the presiding officer constitutes a three-member committee comprising two Judges — one from the Supreme Court and one Chief Justice of a High Court if the complaint is against a HC Judge; and two Supreme Court Judges if the complaint is against a sitting Judge of the apex court — and a jurist to probe the complaint and determine if it is a case fit for initiating the process of impeachment.

    Ads by Google

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Impeadhement By: Gaurav Singla | 01-Feb-2010 Reply | Forward When 75 members of Rajya Sabha signed a written motion against P.D Dinakaran. Is it necessary to after hearing Judge's speech there will be again voting if votes against a judge would be two third only den a judge can be removed by President.
    procedure for judges removal demands modificationBy: AKANKSHA | 28-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward Why granting so much relaxation to judges??????They must not be provided with such protection as this usually make them careless and dishonest towards their duties.Some hard checks are required to made over them that puts them bounded in their duties.Since their removal is nearly impossible, this make them to carry on their misdeeds. WHICH IS UNFORTUNATE FOR A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY LIKE INDIA!!!!!!!!!!!1
    lawyers who come in contact with judges, media and readers of news are best to decide impeachmentBy: B S GANESH BANGALORE | 17-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward For the question Who decides if a Judge should be impeached?, perhaps the right answer is the group of advocates who are daily coming in contact with courts in cases, media and comon citizens are best to decide impeachment. It is not correct for politiians to decide as many politicians are favourites of corrupt judges for their own protection. This is my humble opinion. ##### B S GANESH BANGALORE
    LETHARGIC LAWBy: ANOOPAM MODAK | 17-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward The contention of the Hon'ble Union Law and Justice Minister does not seem to hold water, in respect of framing new law for impeachment of Judicial Officers of the higher hierarchy. The country have never witnessed prosecution of any tainted Judicial officers of any high court or Supreme Court, even after more than six decades of the country's independence, despite the existence of effective law, which is at the mercy of political will. lack of political will is partly attributed to the corruption amongst such Judicial Officers.
    The law on impeachment of judgesBy: N. Sridharan | 17-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward It is said that any law has loop holes; but, in the case of India the required loop holes are first identified and then the law is judiciously built around these convenient loop holes. Just because Rajiv Gandhi asked Congress MPs to abstain from voting the motion was defeated in the case of Justice Ramaswamy. The provision should have been "two thirds majority of the members present and voting" (and not the total members in the Parliament, which loop hole was very convenient for Rajiv Gandhi)
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.