Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The making of the Flaw Purush

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It can be nobody’s case that L.K. Advani lacks political intellect, guile or commitment. For three-and-a-half decades now since he arrived on the national centrestage with his arrest, and then elevation as Information and Broadcasting Minister in the first non-Congress (Janata Party) government in 1977, he has been one of the most prominent success stories of our politics. He has been one of the few truly self-made leaders to have attained such a high position, which is particularly remarkable because unlike many others, Morarji Desai, Chandra Shekhar, V.P. Singh and even Mamata Banerjee, he did not use the Congress fast-track ever. In so many ways, he is truly an original. Nobody who could resurrect a party from the train-wreck of the Janata in 1980 and then lift it from two seats in 1984 to nearly 200 in 1999 and to national power for six years can be written off by history.

    Yet, you’d wonder why we are using the expression “has been” so many times even as we list out his many positive attributes and successes. Even the finest political minds do not get their instinct right all the time. This is particularly so when it comes to choosing a time to call it a day. Advani missed his moment to bow out honourably when the 2009 election results came. He offered to quit but then allowed those around him, the same cynical coterie that he should hold responsible for so brutally damaging his image and political legacy, to “persuade” him to hang on. Hang on to, and for, what, they didn’t tell him and, it seems, he did not bother to ask. The bid for prime ministership over forever, it was entirely up to him to earn a well-deserved farewell in dignity. His CV for a half-century in political life would have still been formidable. But he did not, and has brought himself to this pass now, when he is accused of lying by one of his closest associates, of having his memory fail him and of being weak by his many partymen.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Jab tak Suraj Chand Rahega, Advani PM in waiting RahegaBy: Rahul Mahajan | 01-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Advani- the man responsible for dividing India again into Hindus and Muslims in 1990's. A true fan and follower of Jinnah, he adopted the same strategy to fulfill his political ambitions as Jinnah. But like Jinnah, his success was also short lived and today close friends like Jaswant Singh are exposing his truth (the bundle of lies, he had been telling during the elections).History will remember Advani as India's own Jinnah, who tried his best to make this nation a Jhanum like Pakistan
    Advani Ki ShaitaniBy: Kapil | 02-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward You are right. Advani is India's Indegenous Jinnah. According to him, Gandhi, Nehru and VP Singh were pseudo-secular while Jinnah was secular. This is his definition of secularism. Had it not for VP Singh's supreme sacrifice of his government to save Babri Mosque, India would have seen another Gadar- Ek Hate Katha. But Narsimha Rao, another crooked man, ultimately helped Advani and his clan, demolish the symbol of Hindu Tolerance. Hindus are the greatest tolerants and most secular races in the world, who allowed a mosque to stand on the birthplace of Maryada Purushottam Sri Ram.
    Advani and Sunil GavaskerBy: Prakash Kanungo | 31-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Sunil Gavasker "Retired" when people were still asking why?Today Advani is facing a situation where people are asking Why Not???Aab Sanyass ashram jaannay ka Time aa gaya hai....Jaldee jao aur bachee kuchhi ijjat ko Bachha Low...!!!!BJP ko uskkay aapnnay haal par chhod do...
    Well Said Shekhar Gupta: It is a great service to Secular IndiaBy: Shareef | 31-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Shekhar I appreciate your bold views.The time has come for each individual to contribute to the nation's Integrity.Esp[ecially exposing the lies, and investigating the truth is a very risky job.I congratulate Indian Express to keep doing this great service to India.
    Great analysis of a liar.By: Justincase | 30-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Sir, the kind of networks which people like Advani also stood by are in fact not helping democracy to flourish. On the contrary, these persons are creating a parallel society with own junglee rules and regulations. These networks are mirror image of LeT, Al-Qaida, Hamas, Ku Klux Klan etc.and they serve their own sanghparivar, but not the nation. These sort of people could become national leaders, but they will not be able to represent us Hindu's and our nation internationally. Thank you
    the making of flaw purushBy: mr. haresh | 30-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward I HOPE YOUR VERSION IS TRUE IN REGARD TO SHRI L. K. ADVANI , BUT HIS CALCULATION HAS FAILED VERY MUCH IN NOT OBJECTING TO THE DISMISSAL OF MR. JASWANT SINGH . THE EXPULSION HAS INSULTED THE ENTIRE FRATERNINY OF THE BJP . A SHOW CAUSE NOTICE WAS THE BEST REMEDY . MR. L. K. ADVANI HAS MAINTAINED SILENCE ON THE EXPULSION OF MR. JASWANT SINGH , FOR WRITING HIS OBSERVATIONS IN A BOOK . THIS REASON IS VERY VERY SILLY TO EXPEL A PERSON WHO WAS A PROMINENT MEMBER OF BJP . THE SILENCE OF SHRI ADVANI WILL DEFENATELY RESULT IN A VERY BIG FALL IN HIS CARRIER.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.