Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The new remedies

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • And yet distress continues unabated. Yet suicides go on increasing. Who is swallowing up these packages? What is happening to the packages?

    The Report of the Radhakrishna Committee – The Expert Group on Agricultural Indebtedness – gives a part of the answer. It sets out the result of its inquiries into the fate of the PM’s special package in its Report:

    Commenting on the disbursement of fresh loans, the Committee observes, ‘The gap in the off take of fresh credit in three states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra) indicates that the credit needs of the farmers were not assessed accurately. The credit flow targets do not appear to have been based on a proper assessment of the credit absorption capacity at the farm/household level. In order to ensure that the basic objectives of providing farm credit are not distorted, disbursements should have been made only after proper project appraisal. This also calls for greater coordination among banks and block level officials at the ground level in identifying the genuine credit needs of the people.’

    Ads by Google

    In regard to ‘Irrigation’, it finds, ‘Utilization rates varied across states and between irrigation schemes. In the case of major irrigation schemes, delay occurred because for some of them like Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP) sanction has to be obtained from the Planning Commission and for many others from the Ministry of Environment and Forest and Tribal Affairs. This is a time-consuming process.’

    Pause a moment. That sentence itself gives us a glimpse of the well-practiced trick: the Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme is an existing programme. All that has been done is that it has now been shoved into the new envelope, ‘The PM’s special package for distressed farmers in 31 districts’! But to continue with the findings of the Radhakrishna Committee:

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext2345
    Accountability in Govt.records-- the new remediesBy: S.M.Aurora | 17-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward It is high time that we enforce ISO9001-2000 for management sytems and IS 1600i-2007 for accountability in all govt.departments and statutory organizations to ensure credibility of govt.records. A couple of years ago Dr.APJ AbdulKalam directed DARPG to implement the Indian standard IS 15700-2005 based on International management stadard ISO 9001-2000 in all public service organizations. Now the ball lies with Ms. Pratibha Patil . Let us see how far she is allowed to carry this aim further by Indian politicians
    Accountability in Govt.recordsBy: S.M.Aurora | 17-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward it is high time we enforce ISO 9001-2000 for management systems and IS 16001-2007 for accountability in planning commision and all other public service government departments and statutory organizations to check reoccurence of such follies and ensure credibility of govt.records : The Quality council of India and the planning commision have already said so and former Indian president Dr. APJ Kalam agreed with them and started this exercise in DARPG.Now the balll lies with Ms. Pratibha Patil
    The new remediesBy: Anand | 05-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Irrespective of party in power, govt functions in exactly same way since babu's run it while remaining anonymous. But why keep India's citizen anonymous? In 60 years if govt cannot learn names of its citizens, then all such schemes will flow into "unknown" drains and feed corrupt babu's and their favourite contractors. Mr. Shourie has been part of the Govt and he could not convince even his "esteemed" colleagues.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.