Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The poverty of programmes

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Three separate news stories have a link.

    The first is about the Vidhwa Pension Yojana in UP, under which widows get a monthly pension of Rs 300 as long as they are BPL (below the poverty line).

    UP has 1.5 million widows, so the annual expenditure is Rs 540 crore. The delivery mechanism is apparently foolproof. A village pradhan or city corporator identifies a widow as BPL and then forwards the name to the block office. Then the name goes to the probation officer of the tehsil. After approval, the beneficiary opens a bank account into which the money is transferred directly. Since Rs 300 every month is a large sum for the poor, women who aren't widows have declared themselves widows.

    For instance, in Azamgarh's Mahula village, 104 out of 187 widow pensioners were found to be fake widows. The point is that these aren't isolated cases of fraud. There has been systematic embezzlement with official connivance.

    Ads by Google

    The second story is about a pilot cash transfer scheme, pushed by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, so as to replace PDS.

    PDS doesn't work and leakage and corruption in the system has been abundantly documented, including in variants like the TPDS (targeted PDS) and the AAY (Annapurna Anna Yojana).

    Cash transfers are superior, and these are conditional cash transfers, since they can only be used for food. Under the Ministry's proposed pilot, cash transfers will be used in five villages: Lakhimpur and Hardoi in UP, Panchkula and Jhajjar in Haryana and Central Delhi. BPL rice costs Rs 6 per kg, the open market price is Rs 10. The government subsidy is Rs 10 per kg and the 35-kg-a-month entitlement means an equivalent cash transfer of Rs 350 per month. This will be directly transferred to the beneficiary's bank account. Given the experience with UP's widows, is there any guarantee that there won't be organized embezzlement here too? (Not that PDS is any superior!) After all, similar reports have appeared about the NREGS.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Scrap all poverty programmeBy: Cynic | 28-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Cheats
    CorruptionBy: S.A.Sampath | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Main problem of India is corruption at all levels and population explosion. These are least interesting for media. Governament both at the state level and in the center are not interested in both the problems. One is because of ill goten money required for election, 2nd due thanks to what Sanjai gandhi did. All politions are the same in this regard. In addition to this is our legal system. As some one said, risk to profit is very much in favour of corruption.
    Govt schemes are designed for Embezzlement( Stealing public money is a better expression)By: mahesh vitekar | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Sir,all so called Govt. schemes for the Aam Admi are designed for the maximum stealing of public money.More than sixty years of Poverty alleviation schemes has led us nowhere. I would request respected people like you to start using the simple words "Stealing Public Money" instead of embezzlement or corruption.Only when we all start reading (in the media) about the Stealing of Public Money by the people in power, will they start getting a little cautious about doing it.Maharashtra is reeling under drought,yet it has Rs.350 Crores to throw into the sea for a memorial! It wouldn't give the same for helping create some infrastructure for irrigation.Hope more such articles are printed frequently to make the Govt. ashamed of its crass recklessness.Thanking youYours truly,Mahesh Vitekar
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.