The power of naming
- Trouble mounts for Sreesanth as Mumbai cops gather more evidence
- SIT to seek Supreme Court guidance on Maya Kodnani death penalty issue
- Tamil Nadu police bans Yasin Malik-linked pro-Eelam public meeting
- Kings XI Punjab end IPL 2013 campaign with a win
- Narendra Modi: India losing sheen as agricultural nation
The rape victim's family defies those who view the crime in terms of shame. It's a moment to build on
Congressman and Union minister Shashi Tharoor created a ripple when he suggested that the upcoming law on sexual assault be named after the young woman whose example has so radically jolted society. Now, her family, pursued by mediapersons on this matter, has said it would be an honour if her name was inscribed in the law. This is a deeply courageous stand, one that flies in the face of the rape law and its assumptions of lasting stigma for the victim of sexual assault. In India, Section 228-A of the penal code forbids the public disclosure of a rape victim's identity unless permitted by her, or by the closest member of her family if she has died. It is a sensitive law, mindful of the social shaming that accompanies rape in all too many contexts, and one that leaves the decision to the person most affected by the crime.
This young woman's family has upended that logic, however, rejecting the idea that sexual crime carries an unspeakable shame for the victim. This is the great patriarchal con-job — a woman's sexuality is first burdened with notions of izzat and honour, her freedoms limited by that imposition. And then, if she is assaulted, she is further stigmatised for losing that "honour", for being somehow defiled, despite herself. This language is also used by well-meaning people and institutions, even as they aim to defend women's rights. It is the kind of logic that leads to rape survivors being described as "living corpses". This family's response restores the right perspective to the matter, in wanting to hear her name spoken loud and proud. It reminds us that the public shame should attach to the attacker, not the victim. Whether or not the law is named for her, their readiness to attach her name to it is an enormous gesture.
- Destitute, orphan students outclass rest in Andhra Class 10 exams
- To re-energise ties, PM wants to visit US, waits for confirmation
- NIA court says no terror link, frees 'Hizbul militant' Liyaqat on bail
- CBI arrests its coal allotments investigator on bribery charge
- ‘Cricketer-bookie Amit may have used Jiju to reach Sree’
- BCCI chief N Srinivasan says police must prove spot-fixing allegations