Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The Prime Minister’s ersatz bravado

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In another dig at Advani, Dr Singh said, “When Mr Advani was the Home Minister, the government handed over terrorists to the Taliban in Kandahar.” The entire country knows the extraordinary circumstances in which the Vajpayee government took the painful, unpleasant but unavoidable decision of releasing three terrorists in order to secure the release of 155 passengers aboard the hijacked Indian Airlines plane in December 1999. The action was in consonance with the unanimous decision taken by an all-party meeting convened by the Prime Minister on 27 December, in which the Congress was also present. The meeting had authorised the Vajpayee government to take “whatever decision keeping in mind the interests and safety of the passengers who were on board the aircraft”.

    Let us also scrutinise Dr Singh’s words of ersatz bravado: “My government does not release terrorists when attacked. My government responds with commandos.” The hijacked Indian Airlines plane, when it reached Kandahar airport, was ringed by the tanks of Pakistan-controlled Taliban army. Moreover, the terrorists had placed explosives in the aircraft itself. It was on the sound advice of the Indian Army and Air Force that Prime Minister Vajpayee decided not to risk a commando operation in Kandahar and endanger the lives of 155 passengers. It is, therefore, foolhardy on the part of Dr Singh, who proved himself incapable of sacking his own utterly incompetent home minister for four-and-a-half years because the latter had the protection of 10 Janpath, to now say that he would have sent commandos to battle the terrorists in Taliban territory.

    Ads by Google

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    No guts in this PMBy: S T | 22-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward It is abundantly clear - when he escaped from having the TV debate with Advani. Are yaar, if you have guts the come and have at least a debate - it is the most valuable tool in democracy to present your position/views/thoughts on issues concerning the nation. As for his performance, less said the better.1. Development : No progress in last 5 years, in fact negative on most fronts. 2. Secularism: What an idea sirji! Muslims have first right on the nation's resources! This is definition of secularism?3. Terror : He has been talking a lot about Kandahar, can he for once tell what would have been his choice from a. Let all passengers on the plane be killed but send commandos nevertheless ORb. release captured terrorists but secure lives of Indian people on plane.That the govt has indeed been soft on terror and the terrorists are having a field day - look at how royally Kasab will be treated for the next 15-20 years, but he will not be hanged, nor punished. Even if sentenced to death by Supreme Court 15 years later, he will just become File No. 283 in the queue waiting for president's decision.With this approach to prosecuting terrorists, who will not want to attack our country?
    The Prime Minister's Ersatz BravadoBy: Wasoo Kamulkar | 21-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward LKA was apt in criticising Manmohan as the weakest Prime Minister. He was selected on the recommendation of the 10 Janapath Kitchen-cabinet co-ordinator, Ahmed Patel. His special qualifications gave him edge over two senior-most cabinet ministers, Pranab Mukherji and Arjun Singh. Manmohan did not belong to the Hindu majority and his low profile could have been relied upon for subservience. Look at the way the situation has developed. Sanskrit declares it pointedly,"AHO ROOPAM, AHO DHWANIHI!" Antonia certifies him as the strong Prime Minister and he; in turn compliments Rahul Gandhi to be the Prime Ministerial material. Manmohan claims that Adwaniji rebuked him continuously for his alleged weakness. If he wasnn't hiding behind the Antonia-mask then what stopped him from admonishing Adwaniji during last five years?
    Weak's diatribeBy: G.K | 20-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Manmohan Singh says he is hurt when it is termed as he devalued the PM office and became subservient to Sonia. He conveniently forgot the evidence he himself created by having an anti-constitutional and extra-constitutional authority by giving PM's status to "Chairperson of UPA" immediately after forming the Government. Fortunately it was withdrawn later. This is the writing on the wall no one needs Advani to tell it. I come from a state where a puppet CM was chosen by the incumbent CM when the incumbent was barred to hold the post due to high court ruling on a finance fraud case. Atleast the puppet CM was honest enough to admit his nikhamma activity. On the contrary Manmohan Singh is not just a nikhamma PM but also turning himself a liar. Coming to Manmohan's shooting at Advani. Whatever Mr. Kulkarni the fact and reality might say, the Kandhahar episode is a black mark -- weakness of NDA (but may not be a deliberate one as created by Manmohan). Manmohan also said that during Advani's home ministry time the parliament was attacked. Yes thats correct, but none intended died except the security personnel who are supposed to do that activity and even die. Nothing degrading intended here, I salute those martyr security personnel and of the sincere view that each entrance of these parliament has to be named after those martyrs and their portait (even statue) has to be installed in the parliament campus. However during this weak Manmohan's time the intended people died (including the much hyped 26/11) during all such terroist attacks. Manmohan said that he will not sit in a corner and shed tears when babri mosque was demolished. Yep, correct Advani, a mere MP of a minority party (then) merely shed tears. This petty bureacrat didn't even do that when people of his religion were massacred by his own blue-eyed party, lo and behold its twisting the CBI to give clean chit to the perpertors. Finally Manmohan said that NDA (advani) released terrorists who afterwards plotted attacks on India. Well said, Manmohan took it many steps further by not hanging Afsal guru and making the path of terrorist green by blatant lies that "existing laws and measures are enough to tackle terrorism" and having resisted any moves to bring back those released terroists.
    RE: Weak's diatribeBy: G.K | 20-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Having said all these, I think BJP is over doing this weak PM stuff much like it did with the foreign origin issue during 2004. Too much of dosage would create negative impact, even to this case as well. Its in good interest of BJP that they move on from Weak PM, in other words do not use the term directly even if it is fact.
    Stupid looking Kulkarni on TVBy: Raj | 20-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Normal citizens of the country respect the PM, by calling the PM names, LKA has stooped so low. No citizen would like to hear things said by LKA about India's PM except for BJP mouthpieces like Kulkarni. When he got back from the usually composed honest man, it hurt LKA badly. Take away personal attacks and concentrate on agenda for governance you stupid looking Kulkarni.
    UNDERSTANDBy: AHM | 27-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward I THINK PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE NOT ON PM BUT ARE ON THE WAYS OF GOVERNANCE OF PM. YOU ARE EITHER CONFUSED OR BIAESD
    Shri.Advaniji fully deserves to be the Prime Minister of India.By: Ramesh Gopisetty. | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Shri.S.Kulkarniji is absolutely right in his assessment of shri.Advaniji and this above Article should be circulated among the Masses of India as it is reflectinhg as to what sort of Politician he is. I have read his Book My Country My Life which throws light about his true PATRIOTISM.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.