The privatisation of patronage
Top Stories
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- Indian American teen Eesha Khare invents wondrous 20-sec charger, Google eyes bid
- India and China ask Special Representatives to work on more border steps
- 51 dead as massive tornado roars through US suburb
- iGate sacks CEO Phaneesh Murthy after sexual harassment claim
As the endgame begins for B.S. Yeddyurappa in the Karnataka BJP, a look at the political culture he created and was also nurtured by
As B.S. Yeddyurappa moves into the endgame of his battle from within the BJP, the focus will be, among other things, on the damage he can cause his former colleagues in the party. While that will no doubt make for interesting reading, the more serious concern should be the damage his brand of politics has caused Karnataka. And high on this list would be the effects the political change he led has had on Bangalore.
Yeddyurappa's politics in recent years has been built around two longer-term trends in Karnataka: decentralisation and privatisation of patronage. The state has been a pioneer in decentralisation, with the process gaining momentum in the 1980s, well before the constitutional amendments of 1992. This process created the platform for a number of aspiring, and often ruthlessly ambitious, local politicians.
In the early years of this decentralisation, these politicians grew under the umbrella of state-level leaders belonging to one national party or the other. They provided the grassroots network for state patronage provided by the ruling party. But as the competition among these grassroots politicians grew, it was not possible for any party to absorb all of them. Those who failed to get into the networks of state-level leaders had to find their own resources to provide patronage to their constituents.
With the Reddy brothers in Bellary showing the way, these aspiring local politicians chose to privatise state resources they came into contact with, beginning with government transport and going up to the funds for state schemes. These methods were necessarily illegal, but that was not a deterrent. By the turn of the century, the number of corrupt local leaders was so large that they could not all be accommodated in the Congress and the Janata Dal.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Four years later
Victor's tribulations
Addressing the disenchantment with Doha
The responsibility to protect



















