Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The pros and cons of admitting a presidential error

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Yet, there is a reason that prior inhabitants of the office had been loath to admit error, given the way in which such an admission can undercut the power and the mystique of the presidency, a point that Obama’s own advisers did not dispute.

    And Obama may find that this is not a well that he can return to so easily. Obama has to be particularly careful not to do anything to feed any public concern that he might not be quite ready for this job, which was precisely the argument used against him in the presidential campaign.

    And there is another reason previous presidents were reluctant to admit wrongdoing.

    “He’s saying the buck stops with him,” said Mark McKinnon, who was a longtime advisor to Bush. “But, the bucks can start piling up pretty fast on this job if you’re going to take the heat for every miscue.”

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.