The stolen march
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing: Chennai Super Kings owner's kin under police scanner
- BJP tears into UPA govt on 4th anniversary, says it lacks leadership
- Jessica Lal murder: Actor Shayan Munshi, ballistic expert Manocha to face perjury trial
- India seeks access from US to 26/11 terror convicts Headley, Rana
- BSE Sensex falls 49 pts, Larsen & Toubro Limited shares hit by Q4 data
Pakistan's slow, halting journey towards an unprecedented, civilian-led transition took another bizarre twist this month.
Tahirul Qadri, a populist preacher turned political reformer, arrived in Islamabad with thousands of followers in tow, determined to bring down the federal and provincial governments and to put off elections until the political class is cleansed of corruption and malfeasance. Unusual as the Qadri spectacle was, it was not entirely unexpected. In parroting the army-led security establishment's longstanding aversion to civilian politicians, Qadri is simply the latest in a long string of thinly veiled threats to the democratic order.
What's changed, though, is the efficacy of the attacks: they don't quite seem to go according to plan, as they once did. Qadri left Islamabad claiming victory, but in reality he achieved little. Parliament remains intact, as does the Election Commission of Pakistan, the dissolution of both being central to his demands. And what he did achieve, he achieved through public negotiation with the very representatives he had denounced as charlatans and fraudsters.
Where Qadri has succeeded is in inserting some uncertainty in the election schedule and the caretaker set-up — Pakistan's electoral laws requiring an interim government during the campaign cycle to mitigate political interference in the election process. The federal government appears intent on completing its five-year term in mid-March and thereafter going for elections within 60 days, with a general election likely in early May.
But Qadri forced the government's hand and made it publicly pledge to dissolve parliament before its five-year term expires, giving the caretaker set-up up to 90 days in office, there being a difference of 30 days in the election cycle for a parliament that completes its full term, and one that is dissolved earlier. In addition, Qadri has made the government concede that it will consult him in the process of nominating the caretaker prime minister and that the first 30 days of the campaign cycle will be used only to vet candidates, in line with constitutional provisions.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Fixing probe now reaches Bollywood, son of Dara Singh held
- BCCI cashes Pune Warriors guarantee, 'disgusted' Sahara walks out of IPL
- Sreesanth spent Rs 1.95L on clothes, bought friend BlackBerry, paid in cash: Police
- Delhi firm with MoD as client is linked to Pak cyberattacks
- After Infosys, iGATE sacks Phaneesh Murthy for sexual misconduct
- 2 weeks after harassment, Haryana schoolgirls return, cops in tow
- UPA-2 anniversary today, report card to outline work done in last 9 years


Grey Wednesday
Me captain, you team: Very vain, very effective
For democracy and bijli, uninterrupted supply
Four years later




















