Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The triumph and the glory

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • There are moments in the life of nations that are harbingers of deep changes. The Congress has achieved what even so many of its friends thought was unthinkable: not just a return to power, but a return with such aplomb. No amount of psephological quibbling can take away from this achievement. They put a lie to the proposition that this was not a national election, but a sum of state elections. The swing towards them across large parts of the country is too significant to be dismissed as a conjuncture of lots of local factors. But this is also a moment where the nation is also entitled to some degree of self-congratulation. Small exceptions apart, this election represents a big defeat for the politics of opportunism, obfuscation and obscurantism. Those political forces that thought that mere political bargaining with others was a substitute for an electoral strategy have lost. Instead a message has been sent out, loud and clear, that playing spoiler, switching sides in order to pre-empt the people’s mandate, changing positions at the last minute are simply not on. Elections are fundamentally about comparative credibility, and those who were foolish enough to assume that mere words could hoodwink electorates have been cut to size. A large number of parties have been punished for this reason and rightly so.

    This election is also an indicator that the era of votebank politics as we have known it is over. Parties that placed undue confidence in the fact that they had secure vote-bases amongst particular political groups have been given a severe blow. For instance, Mayawati made the same mistake Lalu made in Bihar. She took the Dalit vote so much for granted that she felt even less compelled to deliver. She has not yet recognised that a functioning state, freed from the local political economy of extortion and violence, will be to her benefit in the long run. Lalu’s constituents gave him 15 years; Mayawati’s will give her even less. The Congress did extraordinarily well to step into the breach. The Muslim vote will show a similar trend; here is a group that also feels it now has choices, and this is a healthy sign for Indian politics. It is too soon to say that caste and identity have become irrelevant for politics. They may seem so because the policy agendas that came out of that politics are now deeply entrenched; yet its logic is also involuting, creating new coalitions as in Bihar. It is inevitable that there will be a search for new paradigms. But the post-Mandal age of identity votebanks is over.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    All too familiar observationsBy: Ramana Murthy | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward It seems customary to make such observations after every election. Is the average Indian so mature that he makes a conscious decision to put a stable government in place? To keep the small, bickering regional parties out? To reward good performance?Does the average Indian voter know what is good performance in the first place? If he does, why was the NDA not returned to power in 2004 when the economy showed record growth?And the sensex predictably zooms after every election!
    Dramatisation of victory without reaching even majorityBy: shiney | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward Are you promising to all indians that everything will be set right within the next 5 years and India becomes a fully developed country without illiteracy, starvation, crime, terrorism etc.,Pls be analytical in your approach, for a moment if you were to think Trinamool was with NDA and left and congress fought WB and Kerela elections separately........do u think UPA would have still had the same seats it now has? So would Congress have opted for an alliance with Trinamool, if left hadnt dumped it mid way. Now the results were an output of all these oppurtunistic political alliances, and you guys are asking us to believe that it was a grand political strategy by Rahul. What is his constribution to Indian society apart from his family name? Lets see what columnists like you have to say a year or even 6months down the line. One more thing like 26/11 all of you will be writing same old sob stories like earlier.
    Too early to make any sweeping statementsBy: Shekhar | 19-May-2009 Reply | Forward Aren't all commentators (including yourself) too quick to make sweeping statements? The Indian electorate is wise, it punishes the opportunisitic, etc haven't we heard all this after virtually every election? Nothing much will change just wait 6 months down the line- we will have the same massive corruption, the same cynical politics regarding important national issues like disinvestment, labour reforms. We will be dragging our feet on terrorism, we cannot displease a significant portion of our minority population can we? And yes, the cries for reservations for some other alleged disadvantaged groups will only grow louder.
    Too much generalizationBy: Pathik | 18-May-2009 Reply | Forward I live in Gujarat and I don't agree that Rahul Gandhi magic worked in Gujarat. There was good analysis of results in Gujarat in yesterday's local newspapers. BJP did not gain much in Gujarat because of BSP,SP,MJP - a breakaway section of BJP - etc playing the spoiler. The margins have been thin. It is really naive to say that Rahul Gandhi has swept in Gujarat or the country. There was anti-incumbency against the Left in Kerala and WB, and Left's only opponent in those states was UPA. So it is more like a vote againts Left, which is also a very good sign.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.