Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

The triumph and the glory

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • But in the end nothing can take away from the fact that the Congress’s strategy was hugely successful. Even his critics have to acknowledge that Dr Manmohan Singh’s government seemed to be a safer pair of hands than any of the competitors. He can claim credit for the fact that this election was not taking place against the backdrop of deep discontentment; if anything, most people have more cash in their pockets. Agrarian growth has been impressive, procurement prices high, subsidies galore, government employees with cash in their pockets; and despite the recent slowdown, the continuous record of growth was a strong hand with which to go to the elections. Rahul Gandhi should rightly get the credit for laying the political foundations of this victory. But in end that could not have been possible, without the fact that the government, for all its imperfections seemed more credible than all the rivals.

    Ads by Google

    Rahul Gandhi’s three gambits seem to have paid off handsomely. The first was the decision of the Congress to go it alone; if nothing else, this decision was a reiteration of its character as a special national party. And the timing for this was just right in UP. Second, and more subtly, in states like Punjab,

    Uttarakhand and even, to some extent, in Gujarat, the strategy of energising the Youth Congress and bringing an element of organisational vitality seems to have paid off. And finally, his own subtle strategy of positioning himself as an “outsider” to the system, a source of real, even if somewhat indeterminate newness seems a master stroke. There is no question that at the moment people see Congress as a party of the future, and he was able to embody that idea in all its concreteness. If outcomes were a consequence of predetermined logic, no politics would be necessary. Rahul Gandhi has demonstrated the dividends that risk-taking can have in politics: it can change the rules of the game. This is his moment. He has changed the rules of politics. The country will now look to him to change its horizons for the future.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    All too familiar observationsBy: Ramana Murthy | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward It seems customary to make such observations after every election. Is the average Indian so mature that he makes a conscious decision to put a stable government in place? To keep the small, bickering regional parties out? To reward good performance?Does the average Indian voter know what is good performance in the first place? If he does, why was the NDA not returned to power in 2004 when the economy showed record growth?And the sensex predictably zooms after every election!
    Dramatisation of victory without reaching even majorityBy: shiney | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward Are you promising to all indians that everything will be set right within the next 5 years and India becomes a fully developed country without illiteracy, starvation, crime, terrorism etc.,Pls be analytical in your approach, for a moment if you were to think Trinamool was with NDA and left and congress fought WB and Kerela elections separately........do u think UPA would have still had the same seats it now has? So would Congress have opted for an alliance with Trinamool, if left hadnt dumped it mid way. Now the results were an output of all these oppurtunistic political alliances, and you guys are asking us to believe that it was a grand political strategy by Rahul. What is his constribution to Indian society apart from his family name? Lets see what columnists like you have to say a year or even 6months down the line. One more thing like 26/11 all of you will be writing same old sob stories like earlier.
    Too early to make any sweeping statementsBy: Shekhar | 19-May-2009 Reply | Forward Aren't all commentators (including yourself) too quick to make sweeping statements? The Indian electorate is wise, it punishes the opportunisitic, etc haven't we heard all this after virtually every election? Nothing much will change just wait 6 months down the line- we will have the same massive corruption, the same cynical politics regarding important national issues like disinvestment, labour reforms. We will be dragging our feet on terrorism, we cannot displease a significant portion of our minority population can we? And yes, the cries for reservations for some other alleged disadvantaged groups will only grow louder.
    Too much generalizationBy: Pathik | 18-May-2009 Reply | Forward I live in Gujarat and I don't agree that Rahul Gandhi magic worked in Gujarat. There was good analysis of results in Gujarat in yesterday's local newspapers. BJP did not gain much in Gujarat because of BSP,SP,MJP - a breakaway section of BJP - etc playing the spoiler. The margins have been thin. It is really naive to say that Rahul Gandhi has swept in Gujarat or the country. There was anti-incumbency against the Left in Kerala and WB, and Left's only opponent in those states was UPA. So it is more like a vote againts Left, which is also a very good sign.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.