Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Their lordships agree: Assets public

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Supreme court
    The SC judges has agreed to make details of their assets and wealth public via declarations on the court's website.

    Under pressure from within and outside the judiciary to declare their assets and wealth, judges of the Supreme Court on Wednesday took a historic step by agreeing to make these details public via declarations on the court's website.

    This comes two days after Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan said that in the absence of a law to make public the disclosure of assets, a consensus had to be developed among judges in this regard.

    A senior judge who was present at the meeting today said: “The decision was taken after an unanimous view emerged among members of the bench to make the details public.” Another judge said it was decided by consensus that details of assets held by every judge of the Supreme Court would be revealed on its website.

    Welcoming the decision, former CJI Justice J S Verma “congratulated” all the judges. “I am extremely happy that by taking this step, it will mean an end to the unsavoury debate engulfing the judiciary,” he told The Indian Express.

    Ads by Google

    Earlier this month, the government was forced to defer introduction of a Bill in the Rajya Sabha that exempts judges from making public disclosures of income and assets. Most MPs, including some from the treasury benches, had objections to critical provisions of The Judges (Declaration of Assets and Liabilities) Bill.

    The Bill seeks to make it mandatory for judges to declare their assets and liabilities to a ‘competent authority’ but says that such declaration would neither be made public, nor be questioned by any citizen, a provision the higher judiciary was seen as rooting for. This provision, contained in Clause 6 of the Bill, drew sharp criticism from the BJP and Left parties.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Satyameva jayateBy: Ashutosh bhatt | 28-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Really, this news is verry happy for people,and transfarable judge's property- it's not other but we are alway's says this"SATYAMEVA VIJAYTE" butnow we said with proud.
    The First Step?By: Kishore Karnad | 28-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward On the face of it, this delayed, relucttant, submission to popular demand of declaring assets sounds honest. I hope assets will mean 'family assets'-jjust to plug a possible loophole. As pointed out by some, if such assets appear disproportionate, who will question? who will inestigate the source/s of earning? Who will decide the punishment, if at all? Will such a 'judge' under investigation continue to hold his/her office during pendency of inquiry? Mere declaration of assets will hardly serve the purpose as shown by slumdogs turned crorepati politicians like mayawati etc. Unless these questions are satisfactorly answered, people will continue to believe that in India 'justice' can be baught, bent, or blinded by the rich like the Nandas, Ansals, SalmanKhans, Fardinkhans, and sanjay Dutts. This unfortunate perception should be removed. Before it is too late
    JUDGES TO DECLARE ASSETS--FINALLYBy: Rajesh Vyas | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward By dillydallying over the issue of declaration of assets the judges right from the chief justice of the Supreme court, the judges have come out in very poor light in the public eyes. The judges who enjoyed our greatest respect for their integrity and honesty have done themselves enormous harm and have forced us to become cynical about their integrity. The institution of judiciary has in a way compromised itself by being adamant on the issue od asset declaration.
    Judges' AssetsBy: niki | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Why we are making it look like such a laudatory action on the part of judiciary - right from begining, stand taken by CJ was wrong - morally, ethically , judically. It even lacked common sense and then he goes on national tv berating the high court judge who declared his assets calling him publicity crazy - it is not expected from CJ to make these kinds of remarks about their own fraternity who are on the right track. Govt was with them and tried to introduce a law in last session of parliament exempting them from public domain ? Now in 4 days time things have changed and we are singing hosannas ! We should not pat people for doing their job for which they get paid and should demand proper conduct according to the post / position they hold - let it be CJ, Attorney General or law Minister and any laxicity should not be tolerated.
    Judiciary Standing StrippedBy: M.V.Muthu | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Ninty nine percent may not agree, this is not a welcome development. Submission of Asset-Liability position by Judges to CJ and the latter to the President, in so far as SC and and Judges of HC to HC CJ and the latter to CJ of SC, yes. But making it public will be misused by powerful political culprits who will go ga ga to bring down the standing and supremacy of Judiciary. Mark my words, there is bound to be unending whipping back lash.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.