Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Think about Bengal and India, solve Singur row: PM

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • With the row over Tata's Nano car project in Singur eluding a solution, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said on Wednesday that it is in the interest of West Bengal and India that the issue is resolved "satisfactorily."

    The prime minister also said he did not want to apportion blame but sincerely believed that even now it is "not too late" to find a negotiated settlement which would meet the concerns of those farmers who are agitating as well as the concerns of the investors, the Tatas.

    The Tatas, West Bengal government and the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress are locked in a dispute over farmland acqusition that has led the industry group to consider moving out of the state. Work remains suspended at the Singur for nearly a month.

    Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata is due to hold talks with West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in Kolkata on October three to discuss the company's Nano car project which has run into strong resistance from Trinamool Congress over farmland acquisition issue.

    Ads by Google

    "I will discuss with Ratan Tata all aspects of the small car project which is now in uncertainty," according to Bhattacharjee. Ratan Tata had replied to Bhattacharjee's letter a few days ago expressing his intention to meet him to discuss the impasse.

    With the stalemate continuing, Information and Broadcasting minister P R Dasmunshi said Tatas should have to make "some sacrifice" in the interest of those who will lose land at Singur.

    "Tatas should also make some sacrifice. An industry cannot come up ignoring society. Industry cannot come up in a war-like situation. We will be sending our proposals to the Tatas day-after-tomorrow," Dasmunshi told reporters in Kolkata on Tuesday.

    Responsible?By: sanjoy naskar | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward But why this proposal now? When they have already spend 1500 . W.B Govt is responsible now?
    indian polticsBy: ardhend | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward can manmohan singh can explain all the curruption involved in case related to reliance recently. So , general pubic must be awar before giving their views.recently bypassing all the rule the reliance industries were allowed to participate in govt. contract
    Tatas vs the CommiesBy: Abhishek | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Obviously Tata should not make any more sacrifice. They are already done a lot for common people and as a result they have received a huge loss from West Bengal. Please dont listen to Dasmunsi. Have you pleple ever checked the background of P. Dsamunsi. In college days he use to lead a local goons group in Calcutta. Several times he went to Jail and now in politics. These people should actually be treated as terorist who are actually responsible for killing people without job. So plople please protest against these crude politician and support tata
    Moot MeetingBy: Aki | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Question to ask is what will the TATAs gain by talking to the WB Govt when the problem is being raised by the (in)glorious Trinamool Congress party?
    manmohanBy: jyoti ranjana | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward pm should have been honest and put the all related papersfor public view as it will help to understand the problem. and who is manmohan singh to decide what is good for india and what not. being democratic country let people decide what is best for them othrwise the naxal problem will go beyound controland imagination. the way all wealth is getting concentrated in few hands will have adisastrous effect
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.