Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Third Front experiment a failure, admits CPM

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Cpm
    CPI-M said alliances forged on the eve of the elections were not seen by the people as a 'credible and viable alternative'.

    The CPI(M) on Tuesday virtually admitted that the Third Front experiment was a failure, saying that the alliances forged on the eve of the elections were not seen by the people as a "credible and viable alternative".

    The party, however, also did not shy away from taking some credit for the UPA victory saying some of the measures adopted by the UPA like the NREGA, and the Forest Tribal Act were "pushed through under Left pressure".

    It also noted that Congress gained more support amongst minorities and sections of secular minded people who were keen to ensure that the BJP does not make a comeback.

    The CPI(M) was of the view that the alliance with certain non-Congress, non-BJP parties in various states was required so that a secular electoral alternative emerged.

    "However, these alliances forged in some states on the eve of the elections were not seen by the people as a credible and viable alternative at the national level," the CPI(M) Politbureau said after analysing the electoral debacle.

    Ads by Google

    "What stood the Congress in good stead were some of the measures adopted by the UPA government like the NREGA, the Forest Tribal Act and other social welfare measures which were pushed through under Left pressure," it said.

    On the worst-ever drubbing received since its inception in 1964, it said "serious reverses" suffered by the Left in West Bengal and Kerala were a matter of "deep concern" and efforts will be made to win "support and confidence" of those sections who have been alienated.

    THIRD FRONTBy: INDIAN | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward THIRD FRONT BECAME COMMUNIST FRONT.
    Pseudo communistsBy: KVSKumar | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Thomas, Would you say Capitalism spoiled America, that it finds itself rretrievably lost in recession and meltdown due to the greed of few in authority and business at the same time? Don't forget, it was Marx who declared that "nothing but change is permanent". It applies to communism too. Tragically our communists are pseudos, without real interest to spread the spirit of communism beyond the boarders of Kerala, Tripura and West Bengal. Also, spare some time to to and find the living conditions of people in the villages of those states which claim to be progressive and industrialised (save cities). You will understand what is the difference between real development and industrialisation there. By the by Keralites are migrating to Cities of other states not to villages. Ofcourse today there are migrants from other states in Kerala too. Would you dare to settle in any village of other state?
    The Thirid FrontBy: Mathai Mathew | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward The so called third front comprises of parties which nurse opposing views. Ms Jayalalitha and Mr Naidu are known capitalists and the left were harshly opposing them while these persons were in office. Naidu was accused as doyen of the rich, and another charge was that his 'IT' initiatives only did create cities ignoring the rural poor. Mayavati was blamed for the cast politics. The general public could not be taken for a ride with these type of opportunistic alliances. The left's stand on the Nuclear issue was entirely based on consolidating muslim votes rather than taking into account of the real situation that the country is needs energy to maintain the growth story. The left tried in vain to incite the sentiments of the muslim community. The muslims in contrary, realised that radical moves will only adversely effect the well being of that community.
    There is no place for a third front in Indian politicsBy: Scaria Varghese | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward Communism is modern anachronism that is unsuited to the modern market driven economy. This truism was well understood by the late paramount leader Deng Xiaoping of China and he began to modernise Chinese dilapidated economy. In the late 1970s China began to progress after ditching the moribund and outdated communist policies. No communist country-Marxist or Leninist – ever succeeded in improving the standard of living of its citizenry. That was the reason for the demise of the totalitarian regimes the word over. Indian commies are living in the past that was nothing to be proud of and plenty to be ashamed about. Coalition governments led by Congress or BIP are preferable in Indian politics. To be a viable alternative to Congress, BJP has to reinvent-eschew its Hinduism fetish and embrace Secularism. There is no place for a third front in Indian politics, especially the one led by CPM. Commissars are beholden to China and often acting to serve her interest-disloyal to India.
    THird front no PM cndidateBy: R. Bhakther Solomon | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward Third front experience is not a failure but the strategy only failed to work because a wrong road map was laid in front of the electorate. It should have named one person at the National Level as the PM candidate instead of putting forth all possible names from various parties. It stared with Mayavathi, then Jayalalitha, Pawar suddenly came up, and even Karat name was eventually emerged. Apart from these names the third front was considering other names from the fourth front like Laloo, Paswan, Mulayam , Naidu, Nitish Kumar and even Amar Singh. A dozen names from parties who were hoping to get a total of 225 seats. But then my estimate was 125. The front would have said whicever party gets more than 40 seats that party will get PM.The next Govt at the centre will be either BJP led one or by third front led one. So try to name only one candidate from the beginning and work hard together so as to achieve the mission possible. I hope the leaders will heed to my advice.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.